From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matthew Locke Subject: Re: [RFC] PowerOP Take 3, sysfs UI core 2/5 Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:40:54 -0700 Message-ID: <2af1156365fba2cb6217835d3ef4eda7@nomadgs.com> References: <20060724172954.GC1926@elf.ucw.cz> <200607241149.01700.david-b@pacbell.net> <20060724193545.GA2806@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v624) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20060724193545.GA2806@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.osdl.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: David Brownell , patrick.mochel@intel.com, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, sampsa.fabritius@nokia.com, linux@dominikbrodowski.net List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Jul 24, 2006, at 12:35 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>> But better run this by lkml. >> >> I'd rather see some rough consensus on this list that this is the = >> right way >> to head, before running things like this by LKML. > > I meant "they could suggest how to do the sysfs thing, in reasonable > way". Like echo new_config > file is extermely ugly, but perhaps = > configfs > is suitable? Ah, Is that what you consider ugly, that each parameter is a sysfs file = and the values have to be written to a file to set it up? We can look into configfs and ask lkml (or specific people) for = recommendations on the best mechanism to use.