linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] intel_pstate: provide option to only use intel_pstate with HWP
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:31:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3031066.PyJmDOpUSA@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1423258915-26457-1-git-send-email-kristen@linux.intel.com>

On Friday, February 06, 2015 01:41:55 PM Kristen Carlson Accardi wrote:
> Allow users the option to disable the driver for any hardware
> which does not support HWP.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kristen Carlson Accardi <kristen@linux.intel.com>

OK, queued up for 3.20, thanks!

> ---
>  Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt | 3 +++
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c      | 6 ++++++
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> index 4df73da..07e6701 100644
> --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1469,6 +1469,9 @@ bytes respectively. Such letter suffixes can also be entirely omitted.
>  		       no_hwp
>  		         Do not enable hardware P state control (HWP)
>  			 if available.
> +		hwp_only
> +			Only load intel_pstate on systems which support
> +			hardware P state control (HWP) if available.
>  
>  	intremap=	[X86-64, Intel-IOMMU]
>  			on	enable Interrupt Remapping (default)
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index e7e808d..872c577 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -1019,6 +1019,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver intel_pstate_driver = {
>  
>  static int __initdata no_load;
>  static int __initdata no_hwp;
> +static int __initdata hwp_only;
>  static unsigned int force_load;
>  
>  static int intel_pstate_msrs_not_valid(void)
> @@ -1216,6 +1217,9 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_init(void)
>  	if (cpu_has(c,X86_FEATURE_HWP) && !no_hwp)
>  		intel_pstate_hwp_enable();
>  
> +	if (!hwp_active && hwp_only)
> +		goto out;
> +
>  	rc = cpufreq_register_driver(&intel_pstate_driver);
>  	if (rc)
>  		goto out;
> @@ -1250,6 +1254,8 @@ static int __init intel_pstate_setup(char *str)
>  		no_hwp = 1;
>  	if (!strcmp(str, "force"))
>  		force_load = 1;
> +	if (!strcmp(str, "hwp_only"))
> +		hwp_only = 1;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  early_param("intel_pstate", intel_pstate_setup);
> 

-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.

      reply	other threads:[~2015-02-06 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-02-06 21:41 [PATCH] intel_pstate: provide option to only use intel_pstate with HWP Kristen Carlson Accardi
2015-02-06 22:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3031066.PyJmDOpUSA@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=kristen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).