Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	kernel@pengutronix.de, patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: fix speed grading regression on i.MX6 QuadPlus
Date: Sun, 17 Dec 2017 19:06:41 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3041111.LGmKWMtgYY@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212144133.GR25177@vireshk-i7>

On Tuesday, December 12, 2017 3:41:33 PM CET Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 11-12-17, 14:19, Lucas Stach wrote:
> > The commit moving the speed grading check to the cpufreq driver introduced
> > some additional checks, so the OPP disable is only attempted on SoCs where
> > those OPPs are present. The compatible checks are missing the QuadPlus
> > compatible, so invalid OPPs are not correctly disabled there.
> > 
> > Move both checks to a single condition, so we don't need to sprinkle even
> > more calls to of_machine_is_compatible().
> > 
> > Fixes: 2b3d58a3adca (cpufreq: imx6q: Move speed grading check to cpufreq driver)
> > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> > ---
> >  drivers/cpufreq/imx6q-cpufreq.c | 11 ++++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

Applied, thanks!

      reply	other threads:[~2017-12-17 18:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-11 13:19 [PATCH] cpufreq: imx6q: fix speed grading regression on i.MX6 QuadPlus Lucas Stach
2017-12-12 14:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-12-17 18:06   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3041111.LGmKWMtgYY@aspire.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox