From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] cpufreq / sched: Add flags argument to cpufreq_update_util() Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2016 01:44:41 +0200 Message-ID: <3202429.X9nACUOoOm@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <3752826.3sXAQIvcIA@vostro.rjw.lan> <1874381.hHx7HlTjB3@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160801195930.GZ19455@graphite.smuckle.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:54713 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1755407AbcHAXqZ (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Aug 2016 19:46:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20160801195930.GZ19455@graphite.smuckle.net> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Steve Muckle Cc: Dominik Brodowski , Linux PM list , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , Viresh Kumar , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Juri Lelli , Ingo Molnar On Monday, August 01, 2016 12:59:30 PM Steve Muckle wrote: > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 04:57:18PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Monday, August 01, 2016 09:33:12 AM Dominik Brodowski wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 01:36:46AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > +#define UUF_RT 0x01 > > > > > > What does UUF stand for? > > > > "Utilization upadte flag". > > I had wondered the same - in my patchset I used CPUFREQ_SCHED_UPDATE_* for the > prefixes, though I guess some may object to the length. Well, OK. I guess something like SCHED_CPUFREQ_RT etc would be sufficient? Thanks, Rafael