From: Dhruva G <goledhruva@gmail.com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
Christian Loehle <christian.loehle@arm.com>,
Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Yuanfang Zhang <yuanfang.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] cpuidle: psci: Initialize the PM domains in powered off state for OSI
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 22:04:42 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <327e3afc-0803-4ca4-9c76-249077ab9b2e@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260907111659.263324-5-ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com>
On 07-09-2026 16:46, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> At the point when the PM domain and the topology are registered through the
> genpd subsystem, it's not really known whether corresponding CPUs are
> online and thus if the PM domain should be initialized as powered on or
> not. Instead this information becomes available when the CPU devices gets
> attached to their respective PM domain through dt_idle_attach_cpu().
>
> This is a problem when using PSCI OS-initiated mode, as we may end up with
> a PM domain that has the genpd's status indicating it to be powered on,
> while it in fact may not be the case. In the less severe scenario, this
> leads to selecting a shallower domain idle state for the PM domain than
> necessary. A more critical problem is when a non-CPU device shares the PM
> domain, leading to their corresponding drivers not being able to trust the
> status of it.
>
> Let's fix these problems by initializing the state for the genpd's to be
> powered off and in the deepest possible domain idle state, when using
> OS-initiated mode. The support for ->sync_state() is maintained by setting
> the GENPD_FLAG_POWER_UNKNOWN for the genpds in question.
>
> Reported-by: Maulik Shah <maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260811-domain_off_ss3-v1-0-6a0a0fc023f5@oss.qualcomm.com/
> Reviewed-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Tested-by: Yuanfang Zhang <yuanfang.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
>
> Changes in v3:
> - None.
> Changes in v2:
> - Fix a bug in the call to pm_genpd_init().
>
> ---
> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> index b9e4ad7d43a3..4d8c63d329c2 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-psci-domain.c
> @@ -68,7 +68,8 @@ static int psci_pd_init(struct device_node *np, bool use_osi)
> */
> if (use_osi) {
> pd->power_off = psci_pd_power_off;
> - pd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP;
> + pd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_ACTIVE_WAKEUP | GENPD_FLAG_POWER_UNKNOWN;
> + pd->state_idx = pd->state_count ? pd->state_count - 1 : 0;
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> pd->flags |= GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON;
> } else {
> @@ -78,7 +79,7 @@ static int psci_pd_init(struct device_node *np, bool use_osi)
> /* Use governor for CPU PM domains if it has some states to manage. */
> pd_gov = pd->states ? &pm_domain_cpu_gov : NULL;
>
> - ret = pm_genpd_init(pd, pd_gov, false);
> + ret = pm_genpd_init(pd, pd_gov, use_osi);
If CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT=y,
psci_pd_init(use_osi=true)
-> sets GENPD_FLAG_POWER_UNKNOWN
-> sets GENPD_FLAG_RPM_ALWAYS_ON
-> pm_genpd_init(..., is_off=true)
-> genpd->status = GENPD_STATE_OFF
-> RPM_ALWAYS_ON + OFF is rejected (pmdomain/core.c: pm_genpd_init()
rejects an RPM_ALWAYS_ON domain whose initial state is OFF)
-> return -EINVAL
Therefore, on a PREEMPT_RT platform using OSI and hierarchical PSCI domains, psci_cpuidle_domain_probe()
should fail while initializing the first domain. The genpd providers are then unavailable, so
dt_idle_attach_cpu() fails during PSCI cpuidle initialization and the driver rolls back its CPU
registrations.
I don't have a device on me to test this path, perhaps one of the QC devices + RT config
can reproduce this?
Should PREEMPT_RT case instead initialize these domains as ON?
This might be safer here atleast:
ret = pm_genpd_init(pd, pd_gov,
use_osi && !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT));
Regards,
Dhruva
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-11 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-07 11:16 [PATCH v3 0/5] pmdomain/cpuidle-psci: Fix behaviours for CPU PM domains Ulf Hansson
2026-09-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] pmdomain: core: Rename genpd_status_on() Ulf Hansson
2026-09-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] pmdomain: core: Allow a non-CPU device in a CPU PM domain to do power on Ulf Hansson
2026-09-10 18:31 ` Dhruva G
2026-09-11 9:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-11 10:16 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-11 15:33 ` Dhruva G
2026-09-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] pmdomain: core: Add a genpd config to support unknown initial status Ulf Hansson
2026-09-11 16:13 ` Dhruva G
2026-09-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] cpuidle: psci: Initialize the PM domains in powered off state for OSI Ulf Hansson
2026-09-11 16:34 ` Dhruva G [this message]
2026-09-14 11:28 ` Ulf Hansson
2026-09-07 11:16 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] cpuidle: psci: Move initialization a bit earlier in the boot sequence Ulf Hansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=327e3afc-0803-4ca4-9c76-249077ab9b2e@gmail.com \
--to=goledhruva@gmail.com \
--cc=abel.vesa@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=christian.loehle@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=maulik.shah@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=yuanfang.zhang@oss.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).