Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: return EEXIST instead of EBUSY for second registering

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Thursday, September 19, 2013 10:30:04 PM Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 9:23 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> wrote:
> > On 20 September 2013 07:01, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> wrote:
> >> Sorry,  looks like this one is not enough.

Well, I've already applied this one and it makes sense to me anyway.

> >> please let me know if you prefer me send addon patch
> >> or revised one.
> >
> > Atleast you can let us know what the problem is? And then we
> > can decide on that.. But anyway, you can send a new patch
> > based over latest linux-next (which will have your original patch),
> > and then leave it onto Rafael to merge it or have two patches..
> > (though I am quite sure he will not drop anything now, unless its
> > too screwed.., at worst he might revert it..)..
> 
> looks like the crash is intermittent..., so i thought that patch fixed
> the problem.
> but later I found other suspicious print out.

So, does it mean that the $subject patch fixes the issue for you to some
extent, but more changes are necessary to make it go away completely?

> please check new one:
> 
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2915181/

I see.

I *think* we can just drop the module requesting stuff entirely, because it
doesn't seem to work anyway and udev is handling this for us.

Thanks,
Rafael