From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND Date: Fri, 06 Mar 2015 01:54:39 +0100 Message-ID: <33158689.4nZBVOb2gz@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1424771762-16343-1-git-send-email-boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com> <20150304221729.GI3989@piout.net> <20150305110411.GC13617@leverpostej> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20150305110411.GC13617@leverpostej> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Mark Rutland Cc: Alexandre Belloni , Boris Brezillon , Peter Zijlstra , Thomas Gleixner , Jason Cooper , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Nicolas Ferre , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux PM list List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Thursday, March 05, 2015 11:04:11 AM Mark Rutland wrote: > On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote: > > tiny tiny nitpick: > > > > On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote : > > > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share > > > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by > > ^ an > > Whoops. > > Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend? Fixed, thanks! -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.