From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linaro.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 22:33:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3344ad77-62db-830f-94db-f4bdd7257478@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111080927.GA6689@kroah.com>
>> > #include "base.h"
>> >
>> > @@ -376,6 +377,9 @@ int register_cpu(struct cpu *cpu, int num)
>> >
>> > per_cpu(cpu_sys_devices, num) = &cpu->dev;
>> > register_cpu_under_node(num, cpu_to_node(num));
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_GOV_MENU
>> > + dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit(&cpu->dev, 0);
>> > +#endif
> No way to do this without the #ifdef? That's really not recommended for
> .c code :(
>
Hi Greg,
Thanks for comments!
The function dev_pm_qos_expose_latency_limit() is null if no CONFIG_PM.
So when CONFIG_PM enabled, may we could consider the cpu idle is also
wanted. In this assumption the #ifdef could be removed. If user want to
use this feature, she/he should understand the feature only work on menu
gov only currently. So consider this, I guess we could remove this
#ifdef. :)
Any different concerns on this?
Regards
Alex
BTW,
Although I did try this patch on other platform, but it clearly other
multi core system, like x86 could also get the same benefit.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-11 14:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1483630187-29622-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linaro.org>
2017-01-05 15:29 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpuidle/menu: stop seeking deeper idle if current state is too deep Alex Shi
2017-01-05 15:43 ` Rik van Riel
2017-01-05 15:55 ` Arjan van de Ven
2017-01-05 15:29 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpu: expose pm_qos_resume_latency for each cpu Alex Shi
2017-01-11 8:09 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2017-01-11 14:33 ` Alex Shi [this message]
2017-01-11 18:40 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2017-01-12 13:04 ` Alex Shi
2017-01-05 15:29 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpuidle/menu: add per cpu pm_qos_resume_latency consideration Alex Shi
2017-01-05 15:48 ` [PATCH 0/3] per cpu resume latency Alex Shi
2017-01-10 8:02 ` Alex Shi
2017-01-19 21:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3344ad77-62db-830f-94db-f4bdd7257478@linaro.org \
--to=alex.shi@linaro.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).