From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove setting of policy->cpu in policy->cpus during init
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 15:28:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3370743.J1RHLWftxj@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170811050902.GC3638@vireshk-i7>
On Friday, August 11, 2017 7:09:02 AM CEST Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 10-08-17, 15:58, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > policy->cpu is copied into policy->cpus in cpufreq_online() before
> > calling into cpufreq_driver->init(). So there's no need to set the
> > same in the individual driver init() functions again.
> >
> > This patch removes the redundant setting of policy->cpu in policy->cpus
> > in intel_pstate and cppc drivers.
> >
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > Reported-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c | 1 -
> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 1 -
> > 2 files changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Hi Viresh,
> >
> > I had copied the cpumask_set_cpu from one of these drivers and when you
> > pointed out I thought it's better to remove the reference too. Let me
> > know if it makes sense.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Sudeep
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> > index 10be285c9055..a1c3025f9df7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cppc_cpufreq.c
> > @@ -172,7 +172,6 @@ static int cppc_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > return -EFAULT;
> > }
> >
> > - cpumask_set_cpu(policy->cpu, policy->cpus);
> > cpu->cur_policy = policy;
> >
> > /* Set policy->cur to max now. The governors will adjust later. */
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > index 0566455f233e..d82429859103 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > @@ -2133,7 +2133,6 @@ static int __intel_pstate_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > policy->cpuinfo.max_freq *= cpu->pstate.scaling;
> >
> > intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits(policy);
> > - cpumask_set_cpu(policy->cpu, policy->cpus);
> >
> > policy->fast_switch_possible = true;
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
>
Applied, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-22 13:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-10 14:58 [PATCH] cpufreq: remove setting of policy->cpu in policy->cpus during init Sudeep Holla
2017-08-11 5:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2017-08-22 13:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3370743.J1RHLWftxj@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox