From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: powernv: fix stack bloat and NR_CPUS limitation
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2019 16:26:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3664438.dB2cPXlXpS@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018050712.qr2axffmbms5h4xb@vireshk-i7>
On Friday, October 18, 2019 7:07:12 AM CET Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-10-19, 21:55, John Hubbard wrote:
> > The following build warning occurred on powerpc 64-bit builds:
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c: In function 'init_chip_info':
> > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c:1070:1: warning: the frame size of 1040 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> >
> > This is due to putting 1024 bytes on the stack:
> >
> > unsigned int chip[256];
> >
> > ...and while looking at this, it also has a bug: it fails with a stack
> > overrun, if CONFIG_NR_CPUS > 256.
> >
> > Fix both problems by dynamically allocating based on CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
> >
> > Fixes: 053819e0bf840 ("cpufreq: powernv: Handle throttling due to Pmax capping at chip level")
> > Cc: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
> > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubbard@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since v1: includes Viresh's review commit fixes.
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 17 +++++++++++++----
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
>
Applying as 5.5 material, thanks!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-28 15:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-18 4:55 [PATCH v2] cpufreq: powernv: fix stack bloat and NR_CPUS limitation John Hubbard
2019-10-18 5:07 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-28 15:26 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-10-31 2:39 ` Michael Ellerman
2019-10-31 5:17 ` John Hubbard
2019-11-06 3:35 ` Michael Ellerman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3664438.dB2cPXlXpS@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).