From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD9C23FD4; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 09:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739093089; cv=none; b=nP6bzw+Nip9yn+6OovIEEoMaFTXOnX8zTawvf3LXV+ZkakHJsMZZvgWShUIia/XQqSoFrwWaC5Id58ewIeor585HPSh4V/pdt+LX7xiBbPHVwx1XvbnRTSwicRlRBYSTlXmH4lsDREWi8cX9VO0THxMJ/OcAQ+WxZhiFXMfXD70= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739093089; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Su5g4iggh06hom7FhOwOe9xh5oBA+OUDx6rTWwhgShQ=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=jTnma0VdiB9uI+dvjr9vtO4riHAQITonIgk4PZtk0tM3lILbRWCpRhNi3DNDvPTCrRBP5JNRUHpmPHzigUcfFWxypRqv8hVSwrv8GZsPArc5gLSGZDKraYeeoP6wuPnxLb1qH5jOIYJo+BDKCEr7Fhb1pd84QcEMn+2SvHO94IM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=EcSL6PqE; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="EcSL6PqE" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1739093087; x=1770629087; h=message-id:subject:from:to:cc:date:in-reply-to: references:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=Su5g4iggh06hom7FhOwOe9xh5oBA+OUDx6rTWwhgShQ=; b=EcSL6PqE/i2fvfFwvIS8eT5uIUbgEvJvaQEgCmJkKaoecj3kV+hv5fmS d1lzs5IAS+5KTy8F6dMzEoEQmCsev0iweTEvA7YIO4XS86BLriE3OBvjj 6aZd0Gb8xXUqig8+YCriE9awB0uwokytMva6abmFbRPe148upFd5GDw6c KAl/DViK02Fr72uZ0LV3yZ+BIz+0wmpxJAwWBMzquJbLnL0vfFbao4ZXg 5YOnhN86F6n52LnHe39r4HQW2AnB+YKfoAfJrudByEbLflEmBBFKYyiFK Z+dIFfOfEFN/Uq1MQD4VNce4vThy37ruza5GF0skAa+Zc3+mYDnk0yAto Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: VuwIVpb1Rump5CPF/hL8Ow== X-CSE-MsgGUID: C0XlsuL/Tqysdg7bQEhM3w== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6700,10204,11339"; a="39839908" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,272,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="39839908" Received: from fmviesa008.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.148]) by fmvoesa109.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2025 01:24:47 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: v1+arjs7QNyYGc2aJDQIHw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: VmvCN2/lQoCY4fifWftvKA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.13,272,1732608000"; d="scan'208";a="112144468" Received: from linux.intel.com ([10.54.29.200]) by fmviesa008.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 09 Feb 2025 01:24:47 -0800 Received: from abityuts-desk1.ger.corp.intel.com (abityuts-desk1.fi.intel.com [10.237.68.150]) by linux.intel.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE20220B5713; Sun, 9 Feb 2025 01:24:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <38fadf14318be8f3c622719cc526f7586657e0e2.camel@linux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v1] cpuidle: teo: Avoid selecting deepest idle state over-eagerly From: Artem Bityutskiy To: Doug Smythies , "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" Cc: 'LKML' , 'Daniel Lezcano' , 'Christian Loehle' , 'Aboorva Devarajan' , 'Linux PM' Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 11:24:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <009d01db79b9$aecd1c70$0c675550$@telus.net> References: <12630185.O9o76ZdvQC@rjwysocki.net> <009d01db79b9$aecd1c70$0c675550$@telus.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.52.4 (3.52.4-2.fc40) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 On Fri, 2025-02-07 at 15:40 -0800, Doug Smythies wrote: > I have only just started testing the recent idle governor changes, > and have not gotten very far yet. Hi Dough, there is the menu governor patch too. While it helps the server, I did not = test it on a client system. May be you would to check it too? Subject is: [RFT][PATCH v1 0/5] cpuidle: menu: Avoid discarding useful information when= processing recent idle intervals Thanks!