From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jisheng Zhang Subject: RE: regression caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook too early") Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:53:40 +0000 Message-ID: <393b63b7caa7474a97baf248c4891b72@SC-EXCH02.marvell.com> References: <20160617163023.5bb374f8@xhacker> <20160617164054.6339c5d4@xhacker> <20160617131651.GU3923@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160617140353.GQ30154@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <2c6f6aab934141e08d9636739a9f7a94@SC-EXCH02.marvell.com> , Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com ([67.231.156.173]:58583 "EHLO mx0b-0016f401.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751097AbcFQPyK convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:54:10 -0400 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Peter Zijlstra , "Paul E. McKenney" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Viresh Kumar , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Dear Rafael, I used intel_pstate. I just tested v4.7-rc3, which should include commit 4578ee7e1def intel_= pstate: Avoid unnecessary synchronize_sched() during initialization, I can still get = the same=20 wakeups, so it's not sufficient. Another clue maybe helpful, I found these top2 wakeup/s is consistent, = e.g rcu_sched always gives about 10 wakeups/s, and tick_sched_timer gave 5.6-5.9 wakeups/s,=20 144.3 =B5s/s 10.0 Process [rcu_sched] 193.9 =B5s/s 5.7 Timer tick_sched_tim= er Thanks, Jisheng ________________________________________ =46rom: Rafael J. Wysocki=20 Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 23:42 To: Jisheng Zhang Cc: Peter Zijlstra; Paul E. McKenney; Rafael J. Wysocki; Viresh Kumar; = linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: regression caused by bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not s= et utilization update hook too early") On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:40 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 5:32 PM, Jisheng Zhang wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> First of all, sorry for top post, only webmail is available now. >> >> Second, sorry again for report incorrect commit, I were too tired th= is morning so I remember the wrong commit. The regression is caused by= bb6ab52f2bef ("intel_pstate: Do not set utilization update hook too ea= rly"), so I update the email title. > > OK, that makes much more sense. :-) > > And > > 4578ee7e1def intel_pstate: Avoid unnecessary synchronize_sched() > during initialization > > is not sufficient I suppose? I mean, it is not sufficient to reduce the number of wakeups again?