Re: (subset) [PATCH v8 00/10] pmdomain: samsung: add support for Google GS101

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-30T13:38:11Z

On 30/03/2026 15:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
> Usually we want bindings to go along with their respective drivers on
> a subsystem basis.
>
> Both patch2 and patch4 updates DT bindings for the power-domain providers.

Patch 2 yes. Patch 4 not. That's why I did not take patch 2.

>
> Why shouldn't the bindings go along with the driver changes here?

Patch #2 is pmdomain, so with pmdomain drivers thus your tree. Patch #4
is not pmdomain, so not with pmdomain drivers, so not your tree... At
least I do not see any pmdomain parts in that patch #4. It's a Samsung
SoC PMU driver and none of further driver patches touch that PMU driver.

Best regards,
Krzysztof