Re: (subset) [PATCH v8 00/10] pmdomain: samsung: add support for Google GS101

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-30T11:24:58Z

On 30/03/2026 13:12, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>
>>
>>>
>>> Although, as I said, if you think it's best to funnel them through
>>> your tree, please do and then share them via an immutable branch, so I
>>> can apply the pmdomain driver changes.
>>
>> soc must go via my tree, but there is no reason to take the pmdomain
>> binding patch. So I did not take.
>
> Yes, they belong to soc/platform, which is common for most
> power-domain providers.

What does belong to soc/platform? pmdomain changes? No, they do not...

>
> To allow us to merge/maintain power-domain provider *driver* changes
> separately, we needed a way to manage the corresponding DT bindings.

Nothing stops that, there is no dependency. For a week I am saying there
are no dependencies. If there are, please provide any sort of
argument/proof, otherwise there is nothing to do here.

> That's why I am hosting the immutable "dt" branch for these, which
> soc/platform maintainers can pull-in when they need it.
>
> Of course, doing it the other way around is also possible. Just let me
> know what you prefer.

Nothing like that is necessary.

Best regards,
Krzysztof