Re: (subset) [PATCH v8 00/10] pmdomain: samsung: add support for Google GS101

Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-03-30T09:54:08Z

On 23/03/2026 12:13, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 at 14:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:27:45 +0000, André Draszik wrote:
>>> This series adds support for the power domains on Google GS101.
>>>
>>> There are a few differences compared to SoCs already supported by this
>>> driver:
>>> * register access does not work via plain ioremap() / readl() /
>>> writel().
>>> Instead, the regmap created by the PMU driver must be used (which
>>> uses Arm SMCC calls under the hood).
>>> * DTZPC: a call needs to be made before and after power domain off/on,
>>> to inform the EL3 firmware of the request.
>>> * power domains can and are fed by a regulator rail and therefore
>>> regulator control needed be implemented.
>>>
>>> [...]
>>
>> Applied, thanks!
>>
>> [01/10] dt-bindings: soc: google: add google,gs101-dtzpc
>> https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/10084aeadadfab72648f6ed1cc78f7cd87b861ba
>> [03/10] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: move gs101-pmu into separate binding
>> https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/3ec3c42b426fe5e2b48ff19c551dec50bc78788c
>> [04/10] dt-bindings: soc: google: gs101-pmu: allow power domains as children
>> https://git.kernel.org/krzk/linux/c/c8229a5160eea145b796f54317d6e659cec9b080
>>
>> Best regards,
>
> Usually I pick up the power-domain related changes for the DT bindings
> and host them via an immutable branch called "dt". If needed, SOC
> maintainers can pull it to apply/test the corresponding DTS changes.
>
> That said, I am open to whatever you think is best here. Perhaps it's
> easier if you can drop the DT patches and provide your acks instead or
> if you can share them via an immutable branch for me to pull?

I did not pick up any pmdomain binding patches. I picked up only soc and
according to cover letter there are no dependencies between anything here.

Best regards,
Krzysztof