From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: [PATCH 020/228] cpufreq: e_powersaver: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:29:26 +0530 Message-ID: <3c5da1bd55b23a53941ab2bbab5cc68941323b60.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org> References: Return-path: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: References: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: rjw@sisk.pl Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Viresh Kumar List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(). Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar --- drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c index 09f64cc..c1b7c99 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c @@ -403,13 +403,12 @@ static int eps_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy) policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 140000; /* 844mV -> 700mV in ns */ policy->cur = fsb * current_multiplier; - ret = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, ¢aur->freq_table[0]); + ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, ¢aur->freq_table[0]); if (ret) { kfree(centaur); return ret; } - cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(¢aur->freq_table[0], policy->cpu); return 0; } -- 1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e