From: "Lakshmi Sowjanya D (QUIC)" <quic_laksd@quicinc.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>,
"manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com"
<manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Georgi Djakov <djakov@kernel.org>,
Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>,
Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
"Raviteja Laggyshetty (QUIC)" <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>,
"stable@vger.kernel.org" <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sdx75: Drop QPIC interconnect and BCM nodes
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 05:07:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <410402ca56434110956c802aa760a893@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1427bcc-0502-4cfe-9cb2-bae5bb10208e@oss.qualcomm.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Sent: Friday, September 26, 2025 7:17 PM
> To: manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com; Georgi Djakov
> <djakov@kernel.org>; Rohit Agarwal <quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com>; Konrad
> Dybcio <konradybcio@kernel.org>; Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>; Krzysztof
> Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>; Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Krzysztof Kozlowski
> <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>; devicetree@vger.kernel.org; Manivannan
> Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>; Raviteja Laggyshetty (QUIC)
> <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>; Lakshmi Sowjanya D (QUIC)
> <quic_laksd@quicinc.com>; stable@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sdx75: Drop QPIC
> interconnect and BCM nodes
>
> On 9/26/25 8:42 AM, Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay wrote:
> > From: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>
> >
> > As like other SDX SoCs, SDX75 SoC's QPIC BCM resource was modeled as a
> > RPMh clock in clk-rpmh driver. However, for SDX75, this resource was
> > also described as an interconnect and BCM node mistakenly. It is
> > incorrect to describe the same resource in two different providers, as
> > it will lead to votes from clients overriding each other.
> >
> > Hence, drop the QPIC interconnect and BCM nodes and let the clients
> > use clk-rpmh driver to vote for this resource.
> >
> > Without this change, the NAND driver fails to probe on SDX75, as the
> > interconnect sync state disables the QPIC nodes as there were no
> > clients voting for this ICC resource. However, the NAND driver had
> > already voted for this BCM resource through the clk-rpmh driver. Since
> > both votes come from Linux, RPMh was unable to distinguish between
> > these two and ends up disabling the QPIC resource during sync state.
> >
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Fixes: 3642b4e5cbfe ("interconnect: qcom: Add SDX75 interconnect
> > provider driver")
> > Signed-off-by: Raviteja Laggyshetty <quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com>
> > [mani: dropped the reference to bcm_qp0, reworded description]
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam
> > <manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com>
> > ---
>
> Too bad no one noticed for the 2 years the platform has been upstream..
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com>
>
> Konrad
Tested-by: Lakshmi Sowjanya D <quic_laksd@quicinc.com> # on SDX75
Regards,
Lakshmi Sowjanya D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-29 5:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-26 6:42 [PATCH v2 0/2] interconnect: qcom: sdx75: Drop QP0 interconnect and BCM nodes Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-09-26 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] interconnect: qcom: sdx75: Drop QPIC " Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-09-26 13:46 ` Konrad Dybcio
2025-09-29 5:07 ` Lakshmi Sowjanya D (QUIC) [this message]
2025-09-26 6:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-bindings: interconnect: qcom: Drop QPIC_CORE IDs Manivannan Sadhasivam via B4 Relay
2025-10-02 1:58 ` Rob Herring (Arm)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=410402ca56434110956c802aa760a893@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_laksd@quicinc.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=djakov@kernel.org \
--cc=konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=manivannan.sadhasivam@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com \
--cc=quic_rohiagar@quicinc.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox