From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH][RFC v5] timekeeping: Ignore the bogus sleep time if pm_trace is enabled Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:31:46 +0200 Message-ID: <4130556.MNmyvLDyHH@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <1472402439-1146-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:51587 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1753595AbcHaAZ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Aug 2016 20:25:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1472402439-1146-1-git-send-email-yu.c.chen@intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Chen Yu Cc: x86@kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , John Stultz , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Xunlei Pang , "3.17+" , Zhang Rui , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On Monday, August 29, 2016 12:40:39 AM Chen Yu wrote: > Previously we encountered some memory overflow issues due to > the bogus sleep time brought by inconsistent rtc, which is > triggered when pm_trace is enabled, and we have fixed it > in recent kernel. However it's improper in the first place > to call __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime() in case that pm_trace > is enabled simply because that "hash" time value will wreckage > the timekeeping subsystem. > > So this patch ignores the sleep time if pm_trace is enabled in > the following situation: > 1. rtc is used as persist clock to compensate for sleep time, > or > 2. rtc is used to calculate the sleep time in rtc_resume. > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org (3.17+) > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki > Cc: John Stultz > Cc: Thomas Gleixner > Cc: Xunlei Pang > Cc: Zhang Rui > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org > Suggested-by: Xunlei Pang > Suggested-by: Rafael J. Wysocki > Suggested-by: Thomas Gleixner > Reported-by: Janek Kozicki > Signed-off-by: Chen Yu > --- > arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c | 12 ++++++++++++ > kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 ++- > 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c > index 79c6311c..5c28197 100644 > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c > @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include > #include > @@ -144,6 +145,17 @@ int update_persistent_clock(struct timespec now) > void read_persistent_clock(struct timespec *ts) > { > x86_platform.get_wallclock(ts); > + > + /* > + * Make rtc-based persistent clock unusable > + * if pm_trace is enabled, only take effect > + * for timekeeping_suspend/resume. > + */ > + if (pm_trace_is_enabled() && > + x86_platform.get_wallclock == mach_get_cmos_time) { > + ts->tv_sec = 0; > + ts->tv_nsec = 0; > + } I'm not sure about this. Looks hackish. > } > > > diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > index 3b65746..9af885d 100644 > --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c > @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > > #include "tick-internal.h" > #include "ntp_internal.h" > @@ -1551,7 +1552,7 @@ static void __timekeeping_inject_sleeptime(struct timekeeper *tk, > */ > bool timekeeping_rtc_skipresume(void) > { > - return sleeptime_injected; > + return sleeptime_injected || pm_trace_is_enabled(); > } > > /** Thanks, Rafael