From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] thunderbolt: icm: Ignore mailbox errors in icm_suspend() Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 01:56:29 +0200 Message-ID: <4219139.ZZxCFtAegj@aspire.rjw.lan> References: <4063610.TqANq0McE8@aspire.rjw.lan> <4165239.xHgWvuTePe@aspire.rjw.lan> <20170727085011.GY2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59071 "EHLO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751584AbdG1AEb (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Jul 2017 20:04:31 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170727085011.GY2369@lahna.fi.intel.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Mika Westerberg Cc: LKML , Linux PM , Andreas Noever , Michael Jamet , Greg Kroah-Hartman On Thursday, July 27, 2017 11:50:11 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 07:05:01PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 04:12:59 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 02:48:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 11:32:44 AM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:10:57PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > On Tuesday, July 25, 2017 01:00:12 PM Mika Westerberg wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 01:31:00AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > > > > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On one of my test machines nhi_mailbox_cmd() called from icm_suspend() > > > > > > > > times out and returnes an error which then is propagated to the > > > > > > > > caller and causes the entire system suspend to be aborted which isn't > > > > > > > > very useful. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Instead of aborting system suspend, print the error into the log > > > > > > > > and continue. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree, it should not prevent suspend but I wonder why it fails in the > > > > > > > first place? Can you check what is the return value? > > > > > > > > > > > > As per the above, the error is a timeout, ie. -ETIMEDOUT. > > > > > > > > > > Ah, right I somehow missed that. > > > > > > > > > > Does it have Falcon Ridge controller or Alpine Ridge? > > > > > > > > I'll check later today, but i guess you'll know (see below). > > > > > > No need to check, it is Alpine Ridge (since it is Dell 9360). > > > > > > > > Just to make sure, can you increase the timeout in nhi_mailbox_cmd() > > > > > to 1000ms or so. It should not take that long though but better to check. > > > > > > > > Well, I can do that, but I don't think it will help. > > > > > > > > It just looks like the chip is not responding at all at that point. > > > > > > I see. > > > > > > Then I think we should apply your patch now and we can investigate this > > > further offline and hopefully find the root cause for the problem. > > > > > > For this patch: > > > > > > Acked-by: Mika Westerberg > > > > OK > > > > I guess I can apply it, then, or if anyone else in the CC wants to do that, > > please let me know. > > Greg typically takes these but I'm fine either way. OK, applied then.