From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM-wakeup: Delete unnecessary checks before two function calls Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2016 22:35:27 +0200 Message-ID: <427a7f9d-d1c2-10be-9a23-30350ced6149@users.sourceforge.net> References: <5307CAA2.8060406@users.sourceforge.net> <530A086E.8010901@users.sourceforge.net> <530A72AA.3000601@users.sourceforge.net> <530B5FB6.6010207@users.sourceforge.net> <530C5E18.1020800@users.sourceforge.net> <530CD2C4.4050903@users.sourceforge.net> <530CF8FF.8080600@users.sourceforge.net> <530DD06F.4090703@users.sourceforge.net> <5317A59D.4@users.sourceforge.net> <546C7E75.9080301@users.sourceforge.net> <558FCAC1.1090605@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <558FCAC1.1090605@users.sourceforge.net> Sender: kernel-janitors-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Len Brown , Pavel Machek , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Am 28.06.2015 um 12:21 schrieb SF Markus Elfring: > From: Markus Elfring > Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2015 12:14:43 +0200 > > The functions dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq() and wakeup_source_unregister() test > whether their argument is NULL and then return immediately. > Thus the test around the calls is not needed. > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring > --- > drivers/base/power/wakeup.c | 10 +++------- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c > index 40f7160..3741bc2 100644 > --- a/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c > +++ b/drivers/base/power/wakeup.c > @@ -341,8 +341,7 @@ void device_wakeup_arm_wake_irqs(void) > > rcu_read_lock(); > list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) { > - if (ws->wakeirq) > - dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq); > + dev_pm_arm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > } > @@ -358,8 +357,7 @@ void device_wakeup_disarm_wake_irqs(void) > > rcu_read_lock(); > list_for_each_entry_rcu(ws, &wakeup_sources, entry) { > - if (ws->wakeirq) > - dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq); > + dev_pm_disarm_wake_irq(ws->wakeirq); > } > rcu_read_unlock(); > } > @@ -396,9 +394,7 @@ int device_wakeup_disable(struct device *dev) > return -EINVAL; > > ws = device_wakeup_detach(dev); > - if (ws) > - wakeup_source_unregister(ws); > - > + wakeup_source_unregister(ws); > return 0; > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_wakeup_disable); > How do you think about to integrate this update suggestion into another source code repository? Regards, Markus