From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@marvell.com>,
"cpufreq@vger.kernel.org" <cpufreq@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg.marvell@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: fix requested_freq reduction issue
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 19:57:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4433736.xh14GOaN7a@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKohpo=2xjR=nr5hyMg9bve5_uVbV79R2FTxks0bLmL7kNV9Mg@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:39:38 AM Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 7 November 2013 07:58, Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@marvell.com> wrote:
> > When decreasing frequency, requested_freq may be less than
> > freq_target, So requested_freq minus freq_target may be negative,
> > But reqested_freq's unit is unsigned int, then the negative result
> > will be one larger interger which may be even higher than
> > requested_freq.
> >
> > This patch is to fix such issue. when result becomes negative,
> > set requested_freq as the min value of policy.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Xiaoguang Chen <chenxg@marvell.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Good Catch.
>
> Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Applied, thanks!
> We need another patch for fixing the other part of code where we
> increase freq..
> We need to replace:
>
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq == policy->max)
> return;
>
> with
>
> if (dbs_info->requested_freq >= policy->max)
> return;
>
> So, that we don't run unnecessary code :)
Care to prepare a patch?
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-07 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-07 2:28 [PATCH] cpufreq: conservative: fix requested_freq reduction issue Xiaoguang Chen
2013-11-07 5:09 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-07 18:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2013-11-08 4:47 ` Viresh Kumar
[not found] ` <CADmjqpNWYVxrXuo106rBuZeZ2BrkGFkmbMJ8jxi39c8kLiQ+iw@mail.gmail.com>
2013-11-08 4:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-08 5:01 ` Xiaoguang Chen
2013-11-08 5:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-08 5:14 ` Xiaoguang Chen
2013-11-08 17:43 ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-11-08 18:16 ` Viresh Kumar
2013-11-08 19:29 ` Stratos Karafotis
2013-11-11 4:43 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4433736.xh14GOaN7a@vostro.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=chenxg.marvell@gmail.com \
--cc=chenxg@marvell.com \
--cc=cpufreq@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox