From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] CPUFreq Fixes for 3.10-rc2 Date: Thu, 16 May 2013 22:51:25 +0200 Message-ID: <4482296.g7Mb85DDVP@vostro.rjw.lan> References: <6691801.RqjZrI7EgH@vostro.rjw.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Return-path: Received: from hydra.sisk.pl ([212.160.235.94]:52283 "EHLO hydra.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752831Ab3EPUmu (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 May 2013 16:42:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, robin.randhawa@arm.com, Steve.Bannister@arm.com, Liviu.Dudau@arm.com, charles.garcia-tobin@arm.com, arvind.chauhan@arm.com On Thursday, May 16, 2013 02:09:46 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16 May 2013 14:16, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Thursday, May 16, 2013 10:39:55 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > >> Hi Rafael, > > > > Hi, > > > >> Here are few more fixes for 3.10-rc2. > > > > I'm actually going to sent the for-rc2 request today, so these are for -rc3. > > Okay. No issues. While I kind of understand why you want [3/3] to go into 3.10, I'm wondering about the other two patches. Why exactly are they needed now? And speaking of patch [3/3], if you paste kernel logs into changelogs, please remove the time stamps (unless they are relevant to the problem being fixed). Thanks, Rafael -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.