Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux PM list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
	Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] cpufreq / sched: Rework of cpufreq_update_util() arguments
Date: Wed, 10 Aug 2016 02:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4498725.ix9jPCHteg@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)

Hi,

There were some comments on the "cpufreq / sched: cpufreq_update_util() flags
and iowait boosting" series I sent some time ago and I wanted to address them,
but for this purpose I had to combine patches [1-2,4/7] from that series
into one and make some changes on top of that.

Then I thought it would be better to send that separately from the iowait
boost part of that series, so here it goes.

[1/2] Removes the util and max args from cpufreq_update_util() and governor
      callbacks and adds a flags argument instead of them.  That argument
      is then used to handle RT and DL in schedutil and the utilization data
      are accessed by it directly (so it is non-modular now to avoid exporting
      the scheduler internals to modules).
[2/2] Replaces the time argument of cpufreq_update_util() with an rq pointer
      which allows some simplifications to be made.

There should be no changes in behavior as a result of this.

Thanks,
Rafael


             reply	other threads:[~2016-08-10  1:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-10  0:43 Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2016-08-10  1:09 ` [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq / sched: Pass flags to cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-10  1:49   ` [Update][PATCH " Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-11 18:03     ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-11 18:05       ` Steve Muckle
2016-08-10  1:11 ` [PATCH 2/2] cpufreq / sched: Check cpu_of(rq) in cpufreq_update_util() Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-08-11 22:34   ` Steve Muckle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4498725.ix9jPCHteg@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=steve.muckle@linaro.org \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox