Re: Alternative Concept [Was: Re: [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3]

Pavel Machek
2006-10-08T07:16:49Z

Hi!

> F) So, how would this work for OMAP1?
>
> Let's limit it, to keep it somewhat simple, to the values contained in your
> "struct pm_core_point" for OMAP:
>
> int cpu_vltg; /* voltage in mV */
> int dpll; /* in KHz */
> int cpu; /* CPU frequency in KHz */
> int tc; /* in KHz */
> int per; /* in KHz */
> int dsp; /* in KHz */
> int dspmmu; /* in KHz */
> int lcd; /* in KHz */
>
> and let's also add a
>
> int i_am_special;

Hehe, nice idea.

> I think that this might be much easier to implement than your PowerOP /
> operating points / PM core / PowerOP - cpufreq interaction patches. As a
> matter of fact, some parts of your operating points table infrastructure
> may be usable for the concept outlined above. So, what do you think? What
> does everyone else involved think about this alternative approach?

Looks okay to me. Unlike powerop design, this actually works for
everyone.
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.