Re: Alternative Concept [Was: Re: [RFC] CPUFreq PowerOP integration, Intro 0/3]

Pavel Machek
2006-10-12T17:23:17Z

Hi!

On Thu 2006-10-12 21:12:20, Vitaly Wool wrote:
>
> On 10/12/06, Pavel Machek <[1]pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
>
> I believe I did pay attention. What PowerOP has is crappy patches,
> crappy changelogs, and when you don't like it, you are obviously
> biased (or not paying attention).
>
> I would say that by these words and by what you say later you confirm
> you just haven't got any valid points you can prove your position
> with.

I do not need to prove my position. What you need is to send
acceptable patches... and you need to have reasonable interface to the
userland, Dominik proposed one.

(And you should learn not to post html to the lists).
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html