From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jiri Slaby Subject: Re: 2.6.21-rc4-mm1 Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 21:13:52 +0100 Message-ID: <46004080.6080202@gmail.com> References: <20070319205623.299d0378.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <45FFF026.4030502@gmail.com> <20070320080944.9cb3c765.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070320183821.GD2670@elf.ucw.cz> <4600389E.6030901@gmail.com> <20070320195659.GA3545@elf.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070320195659.GA3545@elf.ucw.cz> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Machek Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Pavel Machek napsal(a): > Hi! > = >>>> Also, it might be useful to add a temporary /proc/freeze-unfreeze thing >>>> which will simply do a freeze/unfreeze cycle. Then we can apply vario= us >>>> workloads to the machine while madly stressing the freezer code. = >>> echo testproc > /sys/power/disk; echo disk > /sys/power/state ... is >>> pretty much what you want. >> Ok, I'll try this. > = > It will not help you -- probably -- it is equivalent to just running > s2ram. But it should make "successful" testing easier, because you no > longer need machine with working suspend to test refrigerator. Aha, I didn't read it carefully. Suspend is working, but not in this kernel. I haven't tried s2ram in this version. Should I (I'm away from it) -- would it show something? regards, -- = http://www.fi.muni.cz/~xslaby/ Jiri Slaby faculty of informatics, masaryk university, brno, cz e-mail: jirislaby gmail com, gpg pubkey fingerprint: B674 9967 0407 CE62 ACC8 22A0 32CC 55C3 39D4 7A7E