Re: [PATCH v2] pm_ops: add system quiesce/activate hooks

Pavel Machek
2007-04-13T21:05:11Z

Hi!

> > Why not give this added flexibility ? Archs who don't care don't need to
> > bother and it will make us happy... it's not like we are about to -add-
> > burden to other architectures.
>
> Actually, I personally two hands up for adding the flexibility,
> but you should define what is supposed to do on this level and
> what is don't, or not desirable.
>
> For example, I'd like to enter back to suspend mode
> right from "activate" stage, because I've woken up just
> to update some data and I do not want to resume all devices
> for that, is it ok for "activate"?

No, I do not think we can do that w/o major surgery.

--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html