From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2007 20:44:12 -0700 Message-ID: <4622F10C.1080203@goop.org> References: <20070416003723.GM3691@stusta.de> <20070416005446.GB21217@redhat.com> <20070416011636.GO3691@stusta.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070416011636.GO3691@stusta.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Adrian Bunk Cc: gregkh@suse.de, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-pci@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, "Eric W. Biederman" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > I'm not sure why I thought you two ran into the same regression. > > So "hpet=3Ddisable" worked for Jeremy but not for you, IOW: you two were = > running into different regressions? > > @Jeremy: > If this is true, is your HPET related related regression still present = > in -rc7? I need to recheck, but when I tried -rc6, I was still having resume problems but hpet=3Ddisabled didn't help. So I definitely think there are multiple bugs with the same symtoms. I haven't tried -rc7 yet. J