From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [2/2] 2.6.21-rc7: known regressions Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007 08:28:10 -0700 Message-ID: <4628DC0A.60707@goop.org> References: <20070416003723.GM3691@stusta.de> <4628482B.6040804@goop.org> <20070420050344.GG20566@redhat.com> <46284C84.6060301@goop.org> <20070420051908.GH20566@redhat.com> <462850B3.70901@goop.org> <20070420145126.GC25051@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070420145126.GC25051@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Jones , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , Adrian Bunk , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , pavel@suse.cz, linux-pm@lists.osdl.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , gregkh@suse.de List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Dave Jones wrote: > -BUG: at arch/i386/kernel/sched-clock.c:170 init_sched_clock() > - [] show_trace_log_lvl+0x1a/0x30 > - [] show_trace+0x12/0x14 > - [] dump_stack+0x16/0x18 > - [] init_sched_clock+0x58/0x9b > - [] init+0x14b/0x241 > - [] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10 > - ======================= > > heh, one for Ingo :) > Andi, I think. I've got his firstfloor.org patches applied to this kernel. > -ACPI: ACPI Dock Station Driver > -ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: found ejectable bay > -ACPI: \_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR: Adding notify handler > -ACPI: Bay [\_SB_.PCI0.IDE0.PRIM.MSTR] Added > > Hmm, I should try without the dock stuff built. > > -PCI: Using MMCONFIG > +PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd82b, last bus=24 > +PCI: Using configuration type 1 > > Think I've tried with and without MMCONFIG > > -pnp: PnP ACPI: found 11 devices > +pnp: PnP ACPI: found 13 devices > > My Wacom tablet is one of them. There's also a mysterious 13th device :) > > ibm_acpi: IBM ThinkPad ACPI Extras v0.13 > ibm_acpi: http://ibm-acpi.sf.net/ > -ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7BHT37WW-1.10 > +ibm_acpi: ThinkPad EC firmware 7JHT12WW-1.03 > > possibly just because of the touchscreen. > I'm running a very recent BIOS in order to enable hardware virtualization (VT/VMX). The BIOS updates also update the EC firmware. > So most of the differences seem to be BIOS/firmware rather than hardware. > The PCI bus layout is identical for eg. > Do you have Intel wireless? I realized one chance I'd made was to swap the Atheros wireless with Intel, since it just seems to work better overall. I'd never had any major suspend/resume problems that I could attribute to madwifi though (lots of minor wifi-related ones though). > Looking at your .config, I notice that you don't have CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT set > (because you don't have any framebuffer drivers that use it enabled). > Can you enable say.. CONFIG_FB_RADEON=m and CONFIG_FB_RADEON_BACKLIGHT=y > (which should turn on CONFIG_FB_BACKLIGHT=y by dependancy), and see if > it stops working for you? (You don't even need to load radeonfb.ko, just > have it compiled). OK, I'll give it a spin. J