From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Richter Subject: Re: fw-ohci breaks suspend-to-RAM Date: Wed, 06 Jun 2007 23:14:47 +0200 Message-ID: <466723C7.3090305@s5r6.in-berlin.de> References: <200705181207.45868.marcus@better.se> <200705311441.14021.marcus@better.se> <465EDA0E.8060400@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <59ad55d30706061314s45c86e7eja587244a6ed37812@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: In-Reply-To: <59ad55d30706061314s45c86e7eja587244a6ed37812@mail.gmail.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Kristian_H=F8gsberg?= Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Andrew Morton , Marcus Better List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Kristian H=F8gsberg wrote: > I've posted an updated version of the patch here ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ You mean "addition to the previous" patch. :-) > that fixes a byteswapping problem, and should make the stack > actually work after resuming: >=20 > http://marc.info/?l=3Dlinux1394-devel&m=3D118108604226326&w=3D2 That is, protocols which do not involve showing the local ROM to remote nodes are unaffected? In that case I would prefer to defer this new patch until the next merge window if you don't mind. Nevertheless, if Marcus could take the time to check whether his machine keeps happily resuming with the new patch applied, that would be good. I will test it with APM suspend and SBP-2 circa tomorrow. --=20 Stefan Richter -=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D-=3D-=3D=3D=3D -=3D=3D- --=3D=3D- http://arcgraph.de/sr/