From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Lord Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Kexec jump: The first step to kexec base hibernation Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:55:19 -0400 Message-ID: <469632C7.5000903@rtr.ca> References: <1184167831.12556.13.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <20070711172243.ab44c4d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1184251423.9346.55.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> <1184260683.9346.91.camel@caritas-dev.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: david@lang.hm Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Machek , "Huang, Ying" , Andrew Morton , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Jeremy Maitin-Shepard List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org david@lang.hm wrote: > > actually, I think that while you may be able to get away with only one > kernel, you are probably better off with two. on the hibernate kernel > you can choose many 'embedded' options that don't make sense for the > normal kernel (no high mem, no SMP support, no SELinux, no network > routing, not netfilter, use SLOB not SLAB/SLUB, etc). also keep in mind > that each module that you load wastes apartial page of memory. No highmem? No thanks. I really want hibernate to save stuff from above 1GB as well as the stuff below 1GB. Cheers