From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francesco VIRLINZI Subject: Re: Info on LDM, domain system and SOCs Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2007 16:19:13 +0000 Message-ID: <46E56E81.2050105@st.com> References: <46DEB51F.3010000@st.com> <1189430227.8343.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1189430227.8343.5.camel@localhost.localdomain> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Igor Stoppa Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org If you mean the , I already saw it. I think it's good but it isn't enough. I want track also the devices on a clock to be able to notify (for each device) if a clock changes. Igor Stoppa ha scritto: > On Wed, 2007-09-05 at 13:54 +0000, ext Francesco VIRLINZI wrote: > >> Hi all >> I'm looking the Linux Driver Model (LDM) and the PM issues. >> >> I see the LDM is only "bus-oriented". >> Is there an "official" reason why it doesn't track clock and voltage? >> > > Check the clock framework used by OMAP and other SoCs > >