linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>,
	Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 1/2] Revert "ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the _OSC regardless of the query flag"
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2022 13:37:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4707785.GXAFRqVoOG@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4734682.31r3eYUQgx@kreacher>

From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

Revert commit 159d8c274fd9 ("ACPI: Pass the same capabilities to the
_OSC regardless of the query flag") which caused legitimate usage
scenarios (when the platform firmware does not want the OS to control
certain platform features controlled by the system bus scope _OSC) to
break and was misguided by some misleading language in the _OSC
definition in the ACPI specification (in particular, Section 6.2.11.1.3
"Sequence of _OSC Calls" that contradicts other perts of the _OSC
definition).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/CAJZ5v0iStA0JmO0H3z+VgQsVuQONVjKPpw0F5HKfiq=Gb6B5yw@mail.gmail.com
Reported-by: Mario Limonciello <Mario.Limonciello@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/bus.c |   27 +++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -333,21 +333,32 @@ static void acpi_bus_osc_negotiate_platf
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context)))
 		return;
 
-	kfree(context.ret.pointer);
+	capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
+	if (context.ret.length <= OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
+		kfree(context.ret.pointer);
+		return;
+	}
 
-	/* Now run _OSC again with query flag clear */
+	/*
+	 * Now run _OSC again with query flag clear and with the caps
+	 * supported by both the OS and the platform.
+	 */
 	capbuf[OSC_QUERY_DWORD] = 0;
+	capbuf[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] = capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD];
+	kfree(context.ret.pointer);
 
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(acpi_run_osc(handle, &context)))
 		return;
 
 	capbuf_ret = context.ret.pointer;
-	osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
-		capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
-	osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed =
-		capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT;
-	osc_sb_native_usb4_support_confirmed =
-		capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_NATIVE_USB4_SUPPORT;
+	if (context.ret.length > OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD) {
+		osc_sb_apei_support_acked =
+			capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_APEI_SUPPORT;
+		osc_pc_lpi_support_confirmed =
+			capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_PCLPI_SUPPORT;
+		osc_sb_native_usb4_support_confirmed =
+			capbuf_ret[OSC_SUPPORT_DWORD] & OSC_SB_NATIVE_USB4_SUPPORT;
+	}
 
 	kfree(context.ret.pointer);
 }




  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-16 12:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-16 12:35 [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: bus: Fix platform-level _OSC handling and avoid CPPC is not supported Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-16 12:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2022-03-16 12:39 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] ACPI: bus: Avoid using CPPC if not supported by firmware Rafael J. Wysocki
2022-03-16 15:44 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: bus: Fix platform-level _OSC handling and avoid CPPC is not supported Limonciello, Mario
2022-03-17  8:08 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: bus: Fix platform-level _OSC handling and avoid CPPC is not supportedg Huang Rui
2022-03-17 11:43 ` [PATCH v1 0/2] ACPI: bus: Fix platform-level _OSC handling and avoid CPPC is not supported Mika Westerberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4707785.GXAFRqVoOG@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).