From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Shaddy Baddah Subject: Re: Suspend-Resume support in sparc64 kernel? Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 23:51:09 +1100 Message-ID: References: <200810291325.43694.rjw@sisk.pl> Reply-To: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Shaddy Baddah Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Message-ID: <49085C3D.9050709@hotmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200810291325.43694.rjw@sisk.pl> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Wednesday, 29 of October 2008, Shaddy Baddah wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Is there any Suspend-Resume support in the sparc64 kernel? > > Do you mean suspend to RAM or hibernation? I mean suspend to RAM, which is what I believe the Suspend-Resume referred to in the document http://docs.sun.com/app/docs/doc/805-4433/6j46udqi7?l=en&a=view&q=power+management also refers to. My uninformed research into it gives me an indication that it is not. And I'm curious as to whether there was some history to its possible exclusion, or it is just something that no one has ever attempt to implement. Thanks in advance, Shaddy