Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] cpufreq: tegra124: Remove use of disable_cpufreq

Viresh Kumar
2025-06-05T10:51:54Z

On 05-06-25, 11:34, Jon Hunter wrote:
> I think that would be fine. Given that the tegra124-cpufreq driver is the
> parent, if it fails to resume, then I assume that cpufreq-dt driver would
> not resume either?

There is no resume interface in the cpufreq-dt driver, it is the cpufreq core
which resumes to doing DVFS and I think it will try to do DVFS even if tegra's
driver failed.

> Has anyone tested this?

--
viresh