public inbox for linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
To: "Leisner, Martin" <Martin.Leisner@xerox.com>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: syncing the disks when entering sleep
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 08:55:45 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B5A1EE1.5040005@crca.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <76FA3B279DD9DA48896E2B404944957204E0B6AE@USA7061MS02.na.xerox.net>

Hi.

Leisner, Martin wrote:
> 
>>   -----Original Message-----
>>   From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:rjw@sisk.pl]
>>   Sent: Friday, January 22, 2010 4:38 PM
>>   To: Leisner, Martin
>>   Cc: Nigel Cunningham; linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
>>   Subject: Re: [linux-pm] syncing the disks when entering sleep
>>   
>>   On Friday 22 January 2010, Leisner, Martin wrote:
>>   > To clarify what I proposed:
>>   >
>>   > if(user sets knobs)
>>   >     if(disk is spun up)
>>   >          sync
>>   >
>>   > currently the algorithm is
>>   >
>>   >     sync
>>   
>>   Yes, but Nigel said it should be
>>   
>>   if(user knob is unset)
>>             sync
>>   
>>   which I agree with.
>>   
>>   [BTW, please don't top-post in future.]
>>   
>>   Rafael
> 
> if(knob is set) {
>     if(disk is spun up)
>        sync
> } else sync
> 
> The spinup of the disk can have a very noticeable amount of time...if the user doesn't care about syncing, then the top is preferred...

That sounds much better; thanks.

As an aside, I think the writeback code needs some tweaking in general.
I don't know about you guys, but I'm seeing that sync take far longer
than I reckon it should sometimes. Just a gut feeling - not based on
having looked at /proc/meminfo first - but I'd be interested to know if
you think the same.

Nigel

  reply	other threads:[~2010-01-22 21:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-01-22 15:59 syncing the disks when entering sleep Leisner, Martin
2010-01-22 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-22 21:31   ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-22 21:33     ` Leisner, Martin
2010-01-22 21:38       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-22 21:40         ` Leisner, Martin
2010-01-22 21:55           ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2010-01-22 22:06             ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-22 21:35     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-26 13:59   ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 18:17     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-26 14:51       ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27  0:51         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-27  6:45           ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27  7:29             ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-27 20:50             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-28  7:26               ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-28 10:43                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-05  6:38                   ` document open(/dev/snapshot) sideeffects -- was " Pavel Machek
     [not found]                   ` <20100405063852.GA1924@elf.ucw.cz>
2010-04-23 18:28                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
     [not found]                     ` <201004232028.56005.rjw@sisk.pl>
2010-04-24  5:42                       ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27  9:55           ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 20:46             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-31  8:52               ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-31 12:33                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-01 10:49                   ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-01 17:13                     ` Leisner, Martin
2010-02-01 21:09                       ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-02  4:13                         ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-02-10  8:13                           ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-10 10:34                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 10:38                               ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-10 10:58                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 11:02                                   ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-10 18:42                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 20:28                                       ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-16  6:38                                       ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-10 13:31                               ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-10 19:19                                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 21:17                                   ` Leisner, Martin
2010-02-11 14:49                                     ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-11 15:00                                   ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-11 17:28                                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 20:17                                       ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-02-10 20:58                               ` Leisner, Martin
2010-02-01 20:55                     ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-02-01 21:07                       ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-01 22:03                         ` Nigel Cunningham

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4B5A1EE1.5040005@crca.org.au \
    --to=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
    --cc=Martin.Leisner@xerox.com \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox