From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@crca.org.au>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Leisner,
Martin" <Martin.Leisner@xerox.com>
Subject: Re: syncing the disks when entering sleep
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:17:59 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B7465F7.4010404@crca.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201002111828.18861.rjw@sisk.pl>
Hi.
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday 11 February 2010, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>>> Really? If so then it is misdesigned.
>>>>
>>>> Before the "don't sync" proposal, it was okay to have multiple
>>>> power managers.
>>>>
>>>> Actually I have three on zaurus. There's in-kernel suspend on battery
>>>> critical, then there's somehing userspace in desktop environment, and
>>>> then I'm triggering suspends by hand using echo.
>>> To be precise, 1 and 3 are things that override the power manager.
>>>
>>> And if you override the power manager, you're supposed to know what you're
>>> doing, aren't you?
>> I know what I'm doing, but I'd prefer traps not being set for me.
>
> What are you talking about? Either you set the knob or you don't. If you
> don't, nothing changes.
>
>>>>> So really, I don't see anything wrong with a knob that will turn the kernel
>>>>> sync off entirely, because that basically means "my user space is
>>>>> not broken".
>>>> Because, very easily, parts of my users space may be broken.
>>> How exactly would they be broken?
>> I have 3 power managers.
>
> You don't.
>
>> You called that broken before.
>
> Because it is so. Think about user space suspend hooks, for example, like
> s2ram. Surely your kernel emergency suspend can't use anything like this?
>
>> How is power manager expected to work on zaurus, which suspends from
>> kernel on battery critical? echo no > sync; sync; echo mem > state;
>> echo yes > sync?
>>
>> Its still racy..
>
> Please refer to my reply to Oliver.
>
>>> Why don't we just assume that the user who sets the knob knows what he's doing?
>>>
>> Because better alternatives exist. Like 'echo mem:nosync > state'.
>
> That is a sledgehammer.
>
> I really don't understand your objections here and none of the "alternatives"
> you've been talking about so far would be acceptable to me.
I'm in violent agreement with Rafael. Pavel, I think you're overruled on
this one.
Regards,
Nigel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-11 20:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-01-22 15:59 syncing the disks when entering sleep Leisner, Martin
2010-01-22 20:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-22 21:31 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-22 21:33 ` Leisner, Martin
2010-01-22 21:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-22 21:40 ` Leisner, Martin
2010-01-22 21:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-22 22:06 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-22 21:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-26 13:59 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-26 18:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-26 14:51 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 0:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-27 6:45 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 7:29 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-01-27 20:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-28 7:26 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-28 10:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-04-05 6:38 ` document open(/dev/snapshot) sideeffects -- was " Pavel Machek
[not found] ` <20100405063852.GA1924@elf.ucw.cz>
2010-04-23 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
[not found] ` <201004232028.56005.rjw@sisk.pl>
2010-04-24 5:42 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 9:55 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-27 20:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-01-31 8:52 ` Pavel Machek
2010-01-31 12:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-01 10:49 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-01 17:13 ` Leisner, Martin
2010-02-01 21:09 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-02 4:13 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-02-10 8:13 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-10 10:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 10:38 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-10 10:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 11:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2010-02-10 18:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-15 20:28 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-02-16 6:38 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-10 13:31 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-10 19:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-10 21:17 ` Leisner, Martin
2010-02-11 14:49 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-11 15:00 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-11 17:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-11 20:17 ` Nigel Cunningham [this message]
2010-02-10 20:58 ` Leisner, Martin
2010-02-01 20:55 ` Nigel Cunningham
2010-02-01 21:07 ` Pavel Machek
2010-02-01 22:03 ` Nigel Cunningham
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B7465F7.4010404@crca.org.au \
--to=ncunningham@crca.org.au \
--cc=Martin.Leisner@xerox.com \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox