From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/8] PM: Add suspend blocking work. Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:22:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4BD89922.1040306@kernel.org> References: <1272429119-12103-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <1272429119-12103-2-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <1272429119-12103-3-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <1272429119-12103-4-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <1272429119-12103-5-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <1272429119-12103-6-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <1272429119-12103-7-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <20100428194028.GA16389@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100428194028.GA16389@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 04/28/2010 09:40 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> +int schedule_suspend_blocking_work(struct suspend_blocking_work *work) >> +{ >> ... >> + ret = schedule_work(&work->work); > > Off-topic. We should probably export keventd_wq to avoid the duplications > like this. Yeah, had about the same thought. cmwq exports it so I didn't suggest it at this point but then again we don't really know whether or when that series is going in so it might be a good idea to make that change now. Hmm... Thanks. -- tejun