From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tejun Heo Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] workqueues: flush_delayed_work: keep the original workqueue for re-queueing Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 07:15:49 +0200 Message-ID: <4BDA6785.8040906@kernel.org> References: <1272429119-12103-1-git-send-email-arve@android.com> <20100428194028.GA16389@redhat.com> <4BD89922.1040306@kernel.org> <201004282308.10751.rjw@sisk.pl> <20100429185851.GA13862@redhat.com> <20100429194447.GA17280@redhat.com> <20100429194516.GB17280@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20100429194516.GB17280@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Arve_Hj=F8nnev=E5?=@smtp1.linux-foundation.org, Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Hello, On 04/29/2010 09:45 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > flush_delayed_work() always uses keventd_wq for re-queueing, > but it should use the workqueue this dwork was queued on. > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov Acked-by: Tejun Heo I'll queue it through the wq tree I have. Thanks. -- tejun