[RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Deepthi Dharwar]

This patch provides cpu_idle_wait() routine for the powerpc
platform which is required by the cpuidle subsystem. This
routine is requied to change the idle handler on SMP systems.
The equivalent routine for x86 is in arch/x86/kernel/process.c
but the powerpc implementation is different.

Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig                 |    4 ++++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h |    2 ++
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h    |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c           |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index b177caa..87f8604 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ config ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64
 	bool
 	default y if 64BIT
 
+config ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT
+	bool
+	default y
+
 config GENERIC_HWEIGHT
 	bool
 	default y
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index eb11a44..811b7e7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ static inline unsigned long get_clean_sp(struct pt_regs *regs, int is_32)
 }
 #endif
 
+enum idle_boot_override {IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF};
+
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PROCESSOR_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
index e30a13d..ff66680 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
@@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ extern unsigned long klimit;
 extern void *zalloc_maybe_bootmem(size_t size, gfp_t mask);
 
 extern int powersave_nap;	/* set if nap mode can be used in idle loop */
+void cpu_idle_wait(void);
 
 /*
  * Atomic exchange
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
index 39a2baa..b478c72 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
@@ -39,9 +39,13 @@
 #define cpu_should_die()	0
 #endif
 
+unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE;
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
+
 static int __init powersave_off(char *arg)
 {
 	ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
+	boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF;
 	return 0;
 }
 __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off);
@@ -102,6 +106,28 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
 	}
 }
 
+
+/*
+ * cpu_idle_wait - Used to ensure that all the CPUs come out of the old
+ * idle loop and start using the new idle loop.
+ * Required while changing idle handler on SMP systems.
+ * Caller must have changed idle handler to the new value before the call.
+ */
+void cpu_idle_wait(void)
+{
+	int cpu;
+	smp_mb();
+
+	/* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of old idle routine */
+	get_online_cpus();
+	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+		if (cpu != smp_processor_id())
+			smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
+	}
+	put_online_cpus();
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
+
 int powersave_nap;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL

[RFC PATCH v2 2/4] cpuidle: (POWER) cpuidle driver for pSeries

[Deepthi Dharwar]

This patch implements a backhand cpuidle driver for pSeries
based on pseries_dedicated_idle_loop and pseries_shared_idle_loop
routines.  The driver is built only if CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is set. This
cpuidle driver uses global registration of idle states and
not per-cpu.

Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h               |    8 +
 arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c                     |    2 
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig          |    9 +
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile         |    1 
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c |  317 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h        |    3 
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c          |    3 
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c            |    1 
 8 files changed, 341 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
index ff66680..f56a0a7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
@@ -223,6 +223,14 @@ extern void *zalloc_maybe_bootmem(size_t size, gfp_t mask);
 extern int powersave_nap;	/* set if nap mode can be used in idle loop */
 void cpu_idle_wait(void);
 
+#ifdef CONFIG_PSERIES_IDLE
+extern void update_smt_snooze_delay(int snooze);
+extern int pseries_notify_cpuidle_add_cpu(int cpu);
+#else
+static inline void update_smt_snooze_delay(int snooze) {}
+static inline int pseries_notify_cpuidle_add_cpu(int cpu) { return 0; }
+#endif
+
 /*
  * Atomic exchange
  *
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
index ce035c1..ebe5d78 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/sysfs.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
 #include <asm/machdep.h>
 #include <asm/smp.h>
 #include <asm/pmc.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
 
 #include "cacheinfo.h"
 
@@ -51,6 +52,7 @@ static ssize_t store_smt_snooze_delay(struct sys_device *dev,
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	per_cpu(smt_snooze_delay, cpu->sysdev.id) = snooze;
+	update_smt_snooze_delay(snooze);
 
 	return count;
 }
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
index c81f6bb..ae7b6d4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Kconfig
@@ -120,3 +120,12 @@ config DTL
 	  which are accessible through a debugfs file.
 
 	  Say N if you are unsure.
+
+config PSERIES_IDLE
+	tristate "Cpuidle driver for pSeries platforms"
+	depends on CPU_IDLE
+	depends on PPC_PSERIES
+	default y
+	help
+	  Select this option to enable processor idle state management
+	  through cpuidle subsystem.
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile
index 3556e40..236db46 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/Makefile
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PHYP_DUMP)		+= phyp_dump.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_CMM)		+= cmm.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_DTL)		+= dtl.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_IO_EVENT_IRQ)	+= io_event_irq.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES_IDLE)	+= processor_idle.o
 
 ifeq ($(CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES),y)
 obj-$(CONFIG_SUSPEND)		+= suspend.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b5addd7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
@@ -0,0 +1,317 @@
+/*
+ *  processor_idle - idle state cpuidle driver.
+ *  Adapted from drivers/idle/intel_idle.c and
+ *  drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c
+ *
+ */
+
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/moduleparam.h>
+#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
+
+#include <asm/paca.h>
+#include <asm/reg.h>
+#include <asm/system.h>
+#include <asm/machdep.h>
+#include <asm/firmware.h>
+
+#include "plpar_wrappers.h"
+#include "pseries.h"
+
+struct cpuidle_driver pseries_idle_driver = {
+	.name =		"pseries_idle",
+	.owner =	THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT	2
+
+static int max_cstate = MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT - 1;
+static struct cpuidle_device __percpu *pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices;
+static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
+
+void update_smt_snooze_delay(int snooze)
+{
+	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_driver();
+	if (drv)
+		drv->states[0].target_residency = snooze;
+}
+
+static inline void idle_loop_prolog(unsigned long *in_purr, ktime_t *kt_before)
+{
+
+	*kt_before = ktime_get_real();
+	*in_purr = mfspr(SPRN_PURR);
+	/*
+	 * Indicate to the HV that we are idle. Now would be
+	 * a good time to find other work to dispatch.
+	 */
+	get_lppaca()->idle = 1;
+	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 1;
+}
+
+static inline  s64 idle_loop_epilog(unsigned long in_purr, ktime_t kt_before)
+{
+	get_lppaca()->wait_state_cycles += mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - in_purr;
+	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 0;
+	get_lppaca()->idle = 0;
+
+	return ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get_real(), kt_before));
+}
+
+
+static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
+			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+			int index)
+{
+	unsigned long in_purr;
+	ktime_t kt_before;
+
+	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
+
+	local_irq_enable();
+	set_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
+	while (!need_resched()) {
+		ppc64_runlatch_off();
+		HMT_low();
+		HMT_very_low();
+	}
+	HMT_medium();
+	clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
+	smp_mb();
+	local_irq_disable();
+
+	dev->last_residency =
+		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
+	return index;
+}
+
+static int dedicated_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
+				struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+				int index)
+{
+	unsigned long in_purr;
+	ktime_t kt_before;
+
+	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
+
+	ppc64_runlatch_off();
+	HMT_medium();
+	cede_processor();
+
+	dev->last_residency =
+		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
+	return index;
+}
+
+static int shared_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
+			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
+			int index)
+{
+	unsigned long in_purr;
+	ktime_t kt_before;
+
+	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
+
+	/*
+	 * Yield the processor to the hypervisor.  We return if
+	 * an external interrupt occurs (which are driven prior
+	 * to returning here) or if a prod occurs from another
+	 * processor. When returning here, external interrupts
+	 * are enabled.
+	 */
+	cede_processor();
+
+	dev->last_residency =
+		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
+	return index;
+}
+
+/*
+ * States for dedicated partition case.
+ */
+static struct cpuidle_state dedicated_states[MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT] = {
+	{ /* Snooze */
+		.name = "snooze",
+		.desc = "snooze",
+		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
+		.exit_latency = 0,
+		.target_residency = 0,
+		.enter = &snooze_loop },
+	{ /* CEDE */
+		.name = "CEDE",
+		.desc = "CEDE",
+		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
+		.exit_latency = 1,
+		.target_residency = 10,
+		.enter = &dedicated_cede_loop },
+};
+
+/*
+ * States for shared partition case.
+ */
+static struct cpuidle_state shared_states[MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT] = {
+	{ /* Shared Cede */
+		.name = "Shared Cede",
+		.desc = "Shared Cede",
+		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
+		.exit_latency = 0,
+		.target_residency = 0,
+		.enter = &shared_cede_loop },
+};
+
+int pseries_notify_cpuidle_add_cpu(int cpu)
+{
+	struct cpuidle_device *dev =
+			per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, cpu);
+	if (dev && cpuidle_get_driver()) {
+		cpuidle_disable_device(dev);
+		cpuidle_enable_device(dev);
+	}
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init()
+ */
+static int pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init(void)
+{
+	int cstate;
+	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &pseries_idle_driver;
+
+	drv->state_count = 0;
+
+	for (cstate = 0; cstate < MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT; ++cstate) {
+
+		if (cstate > max_cstate)
+			break;
+
+		/* is the state not enabled? */
+		if (cpuidle_state_table[cstate].enter == NULL)
+			continue;
+
+		drv->states[drv->state_count] =	/* structure copy */
+			cpuidle_state_table[cstate];
+
+		if (cpuidle_state_table == dedicated_states)
+			drv->states[drv->state_count].target_residency =
+				__get_cpu_var(smt_snooze_delay);
+
+		drv->state_count += 1;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/* pseries_idle_devices_uninit(void)
+ * unregister cpuidle devices and de-allocate memory
+ */
+static void pseries_idle_devices_uninit(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct cpuidle_device *dev;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		dev = per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, i);
+		cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
+	}
+
+	free_percpu(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices);
+	return;
+}
+
+/* pseries_idle_devices_init()
+ * allocate, initialize and register cpuidle device
+ */
+static int pseries_idle_devices_init(void)
+{
+	int i;
+	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &pseries_idle_driver;
+	struct cpuidle_device *dev;
+
+	pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices = alloc_percpu(struct cpuidle_device);
+	if (pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices == NULL)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		dev = per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, i);
+		dev->state_count = drv->state_count;
+		dev->cpu = i;
+		if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
+			printk(KERN_DEBUG \
+				"cpuidle_register_device %d failed!\n", i);
+			return -EIO;
+		}
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+/*
+ * pseries_idle_probe()
+ * Choose state table for shared versus dedicated partition
+ */
+static int pseries_idle_probe(void)
+{
+	if (max_cstate == 0) {
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG "pseries processor idle disabled.\n");
+		return -EPERM;
+	}
+
+	if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle\n");
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
+	if (get_lppaca()->shared_proc)
+		cpuidle_state_table = shared_states;
+	else
+		cpuidle_state_table = dedicated_states;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int __init pseries_processor_idle_init(void)
+{
+	int retval;
+
+	retval = pseries_idle_probe();
+	if (retval)
+		return retval;
+
+	pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init();
+	retval = cpuidle_register_driver(&pseries_idle_driver);
+	if (retval) {
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Registration of pseries driver failed.\n");
+		return retval;
+	}
+
+	retval = pseries_idle_devices_init();
+	if (retval) {
+		pseries_idle_devices_uninit();
+		cpuidle_unregister_driver(&pseries_idle_driver);
+		return retval;
+	}
+
+	printk(KERN_DEBUG "pseries_idle_driver registered\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static void __exit pseries_processor_idle_exit(void)
+{
+
+	pseries_idle_devices_uninit();
+	cpuidle_unregister_driver(&pseries_idle_driver);
+
+	return;
+}
+
+module_init(pseries_processor_idle_init);
+module_exit(pseries_processor_idle_exit);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Cpuidle driver for POWER");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
index 24c7162..9a3dda0 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/pseries.h
@@ -57,4 +57,7 @@ extern struct device_node *dlpar_configure_connector(u32);
 extern int dlpar_attach_node(struct device_node *);
 extern int dlpar_detach_node(struct device_node *);
 
+/* Snooze Delay, pseries_idle */
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, smt_snooze_delay);
+
 #endif /* _PSERIES_PSERIES_H */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
index c3408ca..9c6716a 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
@@ -586,9 +586,6 @@ static int __init pSeries_probe(void)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(long, smt_snooze_delay);
-
 static void pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep(void)
 { 
 	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
index 26e93fd..bbc3c42 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/smp.c
@@ -148,6 +148,7 @@ static void __devinit smp_xics_setup_cpu(int cpu)
 	set_cpu_current_state(cpu, CPU_STATE_ONLINE);
 	set_default_offline_state(cpu);
 #endif
+	pseries_notify_cpuidle_add_cpu(cpu);
 }
 
 static int __devinit smp_pSeries_kick_cpu(int nr)

[RFC PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Enable cpuidle and directly call cpuidle_idle_call() for pSeries

[Deepthi Dharwar]

This patch enables cpuidle for pSeries and cpuidle_idle_call() is
directly called from the idle loop. As a result pseries_idle cpuidle
driver registered with cpuidle subsystem comes into action. This patch
also removes the routines pseries_shared_idle_sleep and
pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep as they are now implemented as part of
pseries_idle cpuidle driver.

Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig         |    6 ++
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c |   86 +-------------------------------
 include/linux/cpuidle.h                |    2 -
 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
index e458872..0d2a028 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
@@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ config PPC_PASEMI_CPUFREQ
 
 endmenu
 
+menu "CPUIdle driver"
+
+source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
+
+endmenu
+
 config PPC601_SYNC_FIX
 	bool "Workarounds for PPC601 bugs"
 	depends on 6xx && (PPC_PREP || PPC_PMAC)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
index 9c6716a..f624e74 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 #include <linux/irq.h>
 #include <linux/seq_file.h>
 #include <linux/root_dev.h>
+#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
 
 #include <asm/mmu.h>
 #include <asm/processor.h>
@@ -74,9 +75,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(CMO_PageSize);
 
 int fwnmi_active;  /* TRUE if an FWNMI handler is present */
 
-static void pseries_shared_idle_sleep(void);
-static void pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep(void);
-
 static struct device_node *pSeries_mpic_node;
 
 static void pSeries_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m)
@@ -374,18 +372,9 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void)
 
 	pSeries_nvram_init();
 
-	/* Choose an idle loop */
 	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
 		vpa_init(boot_cpuid);
-		if (get_lppaca()->shared_proc) {
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using shared processor idle loop\n");
-			ppc_md.power_save = pseries_shared_idle_sleep;
-		} else {
-			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using dedicated idle loop\n");
-			ppc_md.power_save = pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep;
-		}
-	} else {
-		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle loop\n");
+		ppc_md.power_save = (void *)cpuidle_idle_call;
 	}
 
 	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
@@ -586,77 +575,6 @@ static int __init pSeries_probe(void)
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static void pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep(void)
-{ 
-	unsigned int cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	unsigned long start_snooze;
-	unsigned long in_purr, out_purr;
-	long snooze = __get_cpu_var(smt_snooze_delay);
-
-	/*
-	 * Indicate to the HV that we are idle. Now would be
-	 * a good time to find other work to dispatch.
-	 */
-	get_lppaca()->idle = 1;
-	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 1;
-	in_purr = mfspr(SPRN_PURR);
-
-	/*
-	 * We come in with interrupts disabled, and need_resched()
-	 * has been checked recently.  If we should poll for a little
-	 * while, do so.
-	 */
-	if (snooze) {
-		start_snooze = get_tb() + snooze * tb_ticks_per_usec;
-		local_irq_enable();
-		set_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
-
-		while ((snooze < 0) || (get_tb() < start_snooze)) {
-			if (need_resched() || cpu_is_offline(cpu))
-				goto out;
-			ppc64_runlatch_off();
-			HMT_low();
-			HMT_very_low();
-		}
-
-		HMT_medium();
-		clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
-		smp_mb();
-		local_irq_disable();
-		if (need_resched() || cpu_is_offline(cpu))
-			goto out;
-	}
-
-	cede_processor();
-
-out:
-	HMT_medium();
-	out_purr = mfspr(SPRN_PURR);
-	get_lppaca()->wait_state_cycles += out_purr - in_purr;
-	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 0;
-	get_lppaca()->idle = 0;
-}
-
-static void pseries_shared_idle_sleep(void)
-{
-	/*
-	 * Indicate to the HV that we are idle. Now would be
-	 * a good time to find other work to dispatch.
-	 */
-	get_lppaca()->idle = 1;
-
-	/*
-	 * Yield the processor to the hypervisor.  We return if
-	 * an external interrupt occurs (which are driven prior
-	 * to returning here) or if a prod occurs from another
-	 * processor. When returning here, external interrupts
-	 * are enabled.
-	 */
-	cede_processor();
-
-	get_lppaca()->idle = 0;
-}
-
 static int pSeries_pci_probe_mode(struct pci_bus *bus)
 {
 	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
index 7408af8..23f81de 100644
--- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
+++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
@@ -130,7 +130,6 @@ struct cpuidle_driver {
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_IDLE
 extern void disable_cpuidle(void);
 extern int cpuidle_idle_call(void);
-
 extern int cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv);
 struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_get_driver(void);
 extern void cpuidle_unregister_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv);
@@ -145,7 +144,6 @@ extern void cpuidle_disable_device(struct cpuidle_device *dev);
 #else
 static inline void disable_cpuidle(void) { }
 static inline int cpuidle_idle_call(void) { return -ENODEV; }
-
 static inline int cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
 {return -ENODEV; }
 static inline struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_get_driver(void) {return NULL; }

[RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Deepthi Dharwar]

This patch makes pseries_idle_driver not to be registered when
power_save=off kernel boot option is specified. The
boot_option_idle_override variable used here is similar to
its usage on x86.

Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
---
 arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h            |    1 +
 arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c |    4 ++++
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
index 811b7e7..b286fb7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -382,6 +382,7 @@ static inline unsigned long get_clean_sp(struct pt_regs *regs, int is_32)
 }
 #endif
 
+extern unsigned long  boot_option_idle_override;
 enum idle_boot_override {IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF};
 
 #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
index b5addd7..5f74b4e 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/processor_idle.c
@@ -260,6 +260,10 @@ static int pseries_idle_probe(void)
 		return -EPERM;
 	}
 
+	if (boot_option_idle_override != IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE) {
+		return -ENODEV;
+	}
+
 	if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
 		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle\n");
 		return -ENODEV;

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> This patch provides cpu_idle_wait() routine for the powerpc
> platform which is required by the cpuidle subsystem. This
> routine is requied to change the idle handler on SMP systems.
> The equivalent routine for x86 is in arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> but the powerpc implementation is different.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
> ---

No, that patch also adds this idle boot override thing (can you pick a
shorter name for boot_option_idle_override btw ?) which seems unrelated
and without any explanation as to what it's supposed to be about.

Additionally, I'm a bit worried (but maybe we already discussed that a
while back, I don't know) but cpu_idle_wait() has "wait" in the name,
which makes me think it might need to actually -wait- for all cpus to
have come out of the function.

Now your implementation doesn't provide that guarantee. It might be
fine, I don't know, but if it is, you'd better document it well in the
comments surrounding the code, because as it is, all you do is shoot an
interrupt which will cause the target CPU to eventually come out of idle
some time in the future.

Cheers,
Ben.

>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig                 |    4 ++++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h |    2 ++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h    |    1 +
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c           |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> index b177caa..87f8604 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
> @@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ config ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64
>  	bool
>  	default y if 64BIT
>  
> +config ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT
> +	bool
> +	default y
> +
>  config GENERIC_HWEIGHT
>  	bool
>  	default y
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> index eb11a44..811b7e7 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
> @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ static inline unsigned long get_clean_sp(struct pt_regs *regs, int is_32)
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +enum idle_boot_override {IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF};
> +
>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>  #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PROCESSOR_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
> index e30a13d..ff66680 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ extern unsigned long klimit;
>  extern void *zalloc_maybe_bootmem(size_t size, gfp_t mask);
>  
>  extern int powersave_nap;	/* set if nap mode can be used in idle loop */
> +void cpu_idle_wait(void);
>  
>  /*
>   * Atomic exchange
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
> index 39a2baa..b478c72 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
> @@ -39,9 +39,13 @@
>  #define cpu_should_die()	0
>  #endif
>  
> +unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE;
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
> +
>  static int __init powersave_off(char *arg)
>  {
>  	ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
> +	boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF;
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off);
> @@ -102,6 +106,28 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +
> +/*
> + * cpu_idle_wait - Used to ensure that all the CPUs come out of the old
> + * idle loop and start using the new idle loop.
> + * Required while changing idle handler on SMP systems.
> + * Caller must have changed idle handler to the new value before the call.
> + */
> +void cpu_idle_wait(void)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	smp_mb();
> +
> +	/* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of old idle routine */
> +	get_online_cpus();
> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
> +		if (cpu != smp_processor_id())
> +			smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
> +	}
> +	put_online_cpus();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
> +
>  int powersave_nap;
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Deepthi Dharwar]

Hi Ben,

Thanks a lot for the review.

On 11/28/2011 04:18 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> This patch provides cpu_idle_wait() routine for the powerpc
>> platform which is required by the cpuidle subsystem. This
>> routine is requied to change the idle handler on SMP systems.
>> The equivalent routine for x86 is in arch/x86/kernel/process.c
>> but the powerpc implementation is different.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
>> ---
> 
> No, that patch also adds this idle boot override thing (can you pick a
> shorter name for boot_option_idle_override btw ?) which seems unrelated
> and without any explanation as to what it's supposed to be about.


 Yes, we can pick a better and shorter name for this variable.
 This variable is used to determine if cpuidle framework
 needs to be enabled and pseries_driver to be loaded or not.
 We disable cpuidle framework only when powersave_off option is set or
 not enabled by the user.

> 
> Additionally, I'm a bit worried (but maybe we already discussed that a
> while back, I don't know) but cpu_idle_wait() has "wait" in the name,
> which makes me think it might need to actually -wait- for all cpus to
> have come out of the function.


cpu_idle_wait is used to ensure that all the CPUs discard old idle
handler and update to new one.  Required while changing idle
handler on SMP systems.

> Now your implementation doesn't provide that guarantee. It might be
> fine, I don't know, but if it is, you'd better document it well in the
> comments surrounding the code, because as it is, all you do is shoot an
> interrupt which will cause the target CPU to eventually come out of idle
> some time in the future.


I was hoping that sending an explicit reschedule to the cpus would
do the trick but sure we can add some documentation around the code.

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
>>  arch/powerpc/Kconfig                 |    4 ++++
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h |    2 ++
>>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h    |    1 +
>>  arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c           |   26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> index b177caa..87f8604 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
>> @@ -87,6 +87,10 @@ config ARCH_HAS_ILOG2_U64
>>  	bool
>>  	default y if 64BIT
>>  
>> +config ARCH_HAS_CPU_IDLE_WAIT
>> +	bool
>> +	default y
>> +
>>  config GENERIC_HWEIGHT
>>  	bool
>>  	default y
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> index eb11a44..811b7e7 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/processor.h
>> @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ static inline unsigned long get_clean_sp(struct pt_regs *regs, int is_32)
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +enum idle_boot_override {IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE = 0, IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF};
>> +
>>  #endif /* __KERNEL__ */
>>  #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
>>  #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_PROCESSOR_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
>> index e30a13d..ff66680 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/system.h
>> @@ -221,6 +221,7 @@ extern unsigned long klimit;
>>  extern void *zalloc_maybe_bootmem(size_t size, gfp_t mask);
>>  
>>  extern int powersave_nap;	/* set if nap mode can be used in idle loop */
>> +void cpu_idle_wait(void);
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Atomic exchange
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> index 39a2baa..b478c72 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/idle.c
>> @@ -39,9 +39,13 @@
>>  #define cpu_should_die()	0
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +unsigned long boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_NO_OVERRIDE;
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(boot_option_idle_override);
>> +
>>  static int __init powersave_off(char *arg)
>>  {
>>  	ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
>> +	boot_option_idle_override = IDLE_POWERSAVE_OFF;
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>>  __setup("powersave=off", powersave_off);
>> @@ -102,6 +106,28 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>>  	}
>>  }
>>  
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * cpu_idle_wait - Used to ensure that all the CPUs come out of the old
>> + * idle loop and start using the new idle loop.
>> + * Required while changing idle handler on SMP systems.
>> + * Caller must have changed idle handler to the new value before the call.
>> + */
>> +void cpu_idle_wait(void)
>> +{
>> +	int cpu;
>> +	smp_mb();
>> +
>> +	/* kick all the CPUs so that they exit out of old idle routine */
>> +	get_online_cpus();
>> +	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
>> +		if (cpu != smp_processor_id())
>> +			smp_send_reschedule(cpu);
>> +	}
>> +	put_online_cpus();
>> +}
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_idle_wait);
>> +
>>  int powersave_nap;
>>  
>>  #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
> 
> 


Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:32 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:

> > Additionally, I'm a bit worried (but maybe we already discussed that a
> > while back, I don't know) but cpu_idle_wait() has "wait" in the name,
> > which makes me think it might need to actually -wait- for all cpus to
> > have come out of the function.
> 
> cpu_idle_wait is used to ensure that all the CPUs discard old idle
> handler and update to new one.  Required while changing idle
> handler on SMP systems.
>
> > Now your implementation doesn't provide that guarantee. It might be
> > fine, I don't know, but if it is, you'd better document it well in the
> > comments surrounding the code, because as it is, all you do is shoot an
> > interrupt which will cause the target CPU to eventually come out of idle
> > some time in the future.
> 
> 
> I was hoping that sending an explicit reschedule to the cpus would
> do the trick but sure we can add some documentation around the code.

Well, the question is what guarantee do you expect. Sending a reschedule
IPI will take the other CPUs out of the actual sleep mode, but it will
be some time from there back to getting out of the handler function
(first back out of hypervisor etc...).

The code as you implemented it doesn't wait for that to happen. It might
be fine ... or not. I don't know what semantics you are after precisely.

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/29/2011 02:05 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:32 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> 
>>> Additionally, I'm a bit worried (but maybe we already discussed that a
>>> while back, I don't know) but cpu_idle_wait() has "wait" in the name,
>>> which makes me think it might need to actually -wait- for all cpus to
>>> have come out of the function.
>>
>> cpu_idle_wait is used to ensure that all the CPUs discard old idle
>> handler and update to new one.  Required while changing idle
>> handler on SMP systems.
>>
>>> Now your implementation doesn't provide that guarantee. It might be
>>> fine, I don't know, but if it is, you'd better document it well in the
>>> comments surrounding the code, because as it is, all you do is shoot an
>>> interrupt which will cause the target CPU to eventually come out of idle
>>> some time in the future.
>>
>>
>> I was hoping that sending an explicit reschedule to the cpus would
>> do the trick but sure we can add some documentation around the code.
> 
> Well, the question is what guarantee do you expect. Sending a reschedule
> IPI will take the other CPUs out of the actual sleep mode, but it will
> be some time from there back to getting out of the handler function
> (first back out of hypervisor etc...).
> 
> The code as you implemented it doesn't wait for that to happen. It might
> be fine ... or not. I don't know what semantics you are after precisely.
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> 


Yes, this could be problematic as there is small window for the
race condition to occur . Otherwise we need to manually schedule
it by running a kernel thread but this would definitely have a
overhead and would be an overkill.

Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:12 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> 
> Yes, this could be problematic as there is small window for the
> race condition to occur . Otherwise we need to manually schedule
> it by running a kernel thread but this would definitely have a
> overhead and would be an overkill. 

Depends what this "window" is. IE. What are you trying to protect
yourself against ? What's the risk ?

If it's just module unload, then stop_machine is probably your
friend :-)

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/4] cpuidle: (powerpc) Add cpu_idle_wait() to allow switching of idle routines

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/29/2011 12:31 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Tue, 2011-11-29 at 12:12 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>>
>> Yes, this could be problematic as there is small window for the
>> race condition to occur . Otherwise we need to manually schedule
>> it by running a kernel thread but this would definitely have a
>> overhead and would be an overkill. 
> 
> Depends what this "window" is. IE. What are you trying to protect
> yourself against ? What's the risk ?
> 
> If it's just module unload, then stop_machine is probably your
> friend :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> 


Yup, it is the module unload that I am worried about. Otherwise
manually doing it using kernel thread would be an overkill -:(

Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] cpuidle: (POWER) cpuidle driver for pSeries

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> This patch implements a backhand cpuidle driver for pSeries
> based on pseries_dedicated_idle_loop and pseries_shared_idle_loop
> routines.  The driver is built only if CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is set. This
> cpuidle driver uses global registration of idle states and
> not per-cpu.

 .../...

> +#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT	2
> +
> +static int max_cstate = MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT - 1;

Why "cstate" ? This isn't an x86 :-)

> +static struct cpuidle_device __percpu *pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices;

Shorter name please. pseries_cpuidle_devs is fine.

> +static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
> +
> +void update_smt_snooze_delay(int snooze)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_driver();
> +	if (drv)
> +		drv->states[0].target_residency = snooze;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void idle_loop_prolog(unsigned long *in_purr, ktime_t *kt_before)
> +{
> +
> +	*kt_before = ktime_get_real();
> +	*in_purr = mfspr(SPRN_PURR);
> +	/*
> +	 * Indicate to the HV that we are idle. Now would be
> +	 * a good time to find other work to dispatch.
> +	 */
> +	get_lppaca()->idle = 1;
> +	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 1;
> +}

I notice that you call this on shared processors as well. The old ocde
used to not set donate_dedicated_cpu in that case. I assume that's not a
big deal and that the HV will just ignore it in the shared processor
case but please add a comment after you've verified it.

> +static inline  s64 idle_loop_epilog(unsigned long in_purr, ktime_t kt_before)
> +{
> +	get_lppaca()->wait_state_cycles += mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - in_purr;
> +	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 0;
> +	get_lppaca()->idle = 0;
> +
> +	return ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get_real(), kt_before));
> +}
> +
> +
> +static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> +			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +			int index)
> +{
> +	unsigned long in_purr;
> +	ktime_t kt_before;
> +
> +	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
> +
> +	local_irq_enable();
> +	set_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
> +	while (!need_resched()) {
> +		ppc64_runlatch_off();
> +		HMT_low();
> +		HMT_very_low();
> +	}
> +	HMT_medium();
> +	clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
> +	smp_mb();
> +	local_irq_disable();
> +
> +	dev->last_residency =
> +		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
> +	return index;
> +}

So your snooze loop has no timeout, is that handled by the cpuidle
driver using some kind of timer ? That sounds a lot less efficient than
passing a max delay to the snooze loop to handle getting into a deeper
state after a bit of snoozing rather than interrupting etc...

> +static int dedicated_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> +				struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +				int index)
> +{
> +	unsigned long in_purr;
> +	ktime_t kt_before;
> +
> +	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
> +
> +	ppc64_runlatch_off();
> +	HMT_medium();
> +	cede_processor();
> +
> +	dev->last_residency =
> +		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
> +	return index;
> +}
> +
> +static int shared_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> +			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
> +			int index)
> +{
> +	unsigned long in_purr;
> +	ktime_t kt_before;
> +
> +	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Yield the processor to the hypervisor.  We return if
> +	 * an external interrupt occurs (which are driven prior
> +	 * to returning here) or if a prod occurs from another
> +	 * processor. When returning here, external interrupts
> +	 * are enabled.
> +	 */
> +	cede_processor();
> +
> +	dev->last_residency =
> +		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
> +	return index;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * States for dedicated partition case.
> + */
> +static struct cpuidle_state dedicated_states[MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT] = {
> +	{ /* Snooze */
> +		.name = "snooze",
> +		.desc = "snooze",
> +		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> +		.exit_latency = 0,
> +		.target_residency = 0,
> +		.enter = &snooze_loop },
> +	{ /* CEDE */
> +		.name = "CEDE",
> +		.desc = "CEDE",
> +		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> +		.exit_latency = 1,
> +		.target_residency = 10,
> +		.enter = &dedicated_cede_loop },
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * States for shared partition case.
> + */
> +static struct cpuidle_state shared_states[MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT] = {
> +	{ /* Shared Cede */
> +		.name = "Shared Cede",
> +		.desc = "Shared Cede",
> +		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
> +		.exit_latency = 0,
> +		.target_residency = 0,
> +		.enter = &shared_cede_loop },
> +};
> +
> +int pseries_notify_cpuidle_add_cpu(int cpu)
> +{
> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev =
> +			per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, cpu);
> +	if (dev && cpuidle_get_driver()) {
> +		cpuidle_disable_device(dev);
> +		cpuidle_enable_device(dev);
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init()
> + */
> +static int pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init(void)
> +{

Drop the "idle", those names are too long.

> +	int cstate;

And use something else than 'cstate', we are among civilized people
here ;-)

> +	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &pseries_idle_driver;
> +
> +	drv->state_count = 0;
> +
> +	for (cstate = 0; cstate < MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT; ++cstate) {
> +
> +		if (cstate > max_cstate)
> +			break;
> +
> +		/* is the state not enabled? */
> +		if (cpuidle_state_table[cstate].enter == NULL)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		drv->states[drv->state_count] =	/* structure copy */
> +			cpuidle_state_table[cstate];
> +
> +		if (cpuidle_state_table == dedicated_states)
> +			drv->states[drv->state_count].target_residency =
> +				__get_cpu_var(smt_snooze_delay);
> +
> +		drv->state_count += 1;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/* pseries_idle_devices_uninit(void)
> + * unregister cpuidle devices and de-allocate memory
> + */
> +static void pseries_idle_devices_uninit(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		dev = per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, i);
> +		cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
> +	}
> +
> +	free_percpu(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices);
> +	return;
> +}
> +
> +/* pseries_idle_devices_init()
> + * allocate, initialize and register cpuidle device
> + */
> +static int pseries_idle_devices_init(void)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &pseries_idle_driver;
> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev;
> +
> +	pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices = alloc_percpu(struct cpuidle_device);
> +	if (pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices == NULL)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
> +		dev = per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, i);
> +		dev->state_count = drv->state_count;
> +		dev->cpu = i;
> +		if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG \
> +				"cpuidle_register_device %d failed!\n", i);
> +			return -EIO;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * pseries_idle_probe()
> + * Choose state table for shared versus dedicated partition
> + */
> +static int pseries_idle_probe(void)
> +{
> +	if (max_cstate == 0) {
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "pseries processor idle disabled.\n");
> +		return -EPERM;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle\n");
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +	}

Don't even printk here, this will happen on all !pseries machines and
the debug output isn't useful. Also move the check of max-cstate to
after the splpar test.

Overall, I quite like these patches, my comments are all pretty minor,
hopefully the next round should be the one.

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/4] cpuidle: (POWER) cpuidle driver for pSeries

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/28/2011 04:33 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> This patch implements a backhand cpuidle driver for pSeries
>> based on pseries_dedicated_idle_loop and pseries_shared_idle_loop
>> routines.  The driver is built only if CONFIG_CPU_IDLE is set. This
>> cpuidle driver uses global registration of idle states and
>> not per-cpu.
> 
>  .../...
> 
>> +#define MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT	2
>> +
>> +static int max_cstate = MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT - 1;
> 
> Why "cstate" ? This isn't an x86 :-)


Sure, I shall change it right away :)

> 
>> +static struct cpuidle_device __percpu *pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices;
> 
> Shorter name please. pseries_cpuidle_devs is fine.


I ll do so.

> 
>> +static struct cpuidle_state *cpuidle_state_table;
>> +
>> +void update_smt_snooze_delay(int snooze)
>> +{
>> +	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_driver();
>> +	if (drv)
>> +		drv->states[0].target_residency = snooze;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline void idle_loop_prolog(unsigned long *in_purr, ktime_t *kt_before)
>> +{
>> +
>> +	*kt_before = ktime_get_real();
>> +	*in_purr = mfspr(SPRN_PURR);
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Indicate to the HV that we are idle. Now would be
>> +	 * a good time to find other work to dispatch.
>> +	 */
>> +	get_lppaca()->idle = 1;
>> +	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 1;
>> +}
> 
> I notice that you call this on shared processors as well. The old ocde
> used to not set donate_dedicated_cpu in that case. I assume that's not a
> big deal and that the HV will just ignore it in the shared processor
> case but please add a comment after you've verified it.
>


Yes, the old code does not set donate_dedicated_cpu. But yes I will
try testing it in a shared proc config but also remove this
initialization for shared idle loop.

 
>> +static inline  s64 idle_loop_epilog(unsigned long in_purr, ktime_t kt_before)
>> +{
>> +	get_lppaca()->wait_state_cycles += mfspr(SPRN_PURR) - in_purr;
>> +	get_lppaca()->donate_dedicated_cpu = 0;
>> +	get_lppaca()->idle = 0;
>> +
>> +	return ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get_real(), kt_before));
>> +}
>> +
>> +
>> +static int snooze_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> +			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> +			int index)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long in_purr;
>> +	ktime_t kt_before;
>> +
>> +	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
>> +
>> +	local_irq_enable();
>> +	set_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
>> +	while (!need_resched()) {
>> +		ppc64_runlatch_off();
>> +		HMT_low();
>> +		HMT_very_low();
>> +	}
>> +	HMT_medium();
>> +	clear_thread_flag(TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG);
>> +	smp_mb();
>> +	local_irq_disable();
>> +
>> +	dev->last_residency =
>> +		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
>> +	return index;
>> +}
> 
> So your snooze loop has no timeout, is that handled by the cpuidle
> driver using some kind of timer ? That sounds a lot less efficient than
> passing a max delay to the snooze loop to handle getting into a deeper
> state after a bit of snoozing rather than interrupting etc...


My bad, snooze_loop is essential for a time out. Nope cpuidle
driver doesn't have any timer mechanism. I ll fix it.
Need to add loop for snooze time.

>> +static int dedicated_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> +				struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> +				int index)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long in_purr;
>> +	ktime_t kt_before;
>> +
>> +	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
>> +
>> +	ppc64_runlatch_off();
>> +	HMT_medium();
>> +	cede_processor();
>> +
>> +	dev->last_residency =
>> +		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
>> +	return index;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int shared_cede_loop(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
>> +			struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
>> +			int index)
>> +{
>> +	unsigned long in_purr;
>> +	ktime_t kt_before;
>> +
>> +	idle_loop_prolog(&in_purr, &kt_before);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Yield the processor to the hypervisor.  We return if
>> +	 * an external interrupt occurs (which are driven prior
>> +	 * to returning here) or if a prod occurs from another
>> +	 * processor. When returning here, external interrupts
>> +	 * are enabled.
>> +	 */
>> +	cede_processor();
>> +
>> +	dev->last_residency =
>> +		(int)idle_loop_epilog(in_purr, kt_before);
>> +	return index;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * States for dedicated partition case.
>> + */
>> +static struct cpuidle_state dedicated_states[MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT] = {
>> +	{ /* Snooze */
>> +		.name = "snooze",
>> +		.desc = "snooze",
>> +		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
>> +		.exit_latency = 0,
>> +		.target_residency = 0,
>> +		.enter = &snooze_loop },
>> +	{ /* CEDE */
>> +		.name = "CEDE",
>> +		.desc = "CEDE",
>> +		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
>> +		.exit_latency = 1,
>> +		.target_residency = 10,
>> +		.enter = &dedicated_cede_loop },
>> +};
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * States for shared partition case.
>> + */
>> +static struct cpuidle_state shared_states[MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT] = {
>> +	{ /* Shared Cede */
>> +		.name = "Shared Cede",
>> +		.desc = "Shared Cede",
>> +		.flags = CPUIDLE_FLAG_TIME_VALID,
>> +		.exit_latency = 0,
>> +		.target_residency = 0,
>> +		.enter = &shared_cede_loop },
>> +};
>> +
>> +int pseries_notify_cpuidle_add_cpu(int cpu)
>> +{
>> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev =
>> +			per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, cpu);
>> +	if (dev && cpuidle_get_driver()) {
>> +		cpuidle_disable_device(dev);
>> +		cpuidle_enable_device(dev);
>> +	}
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init()
>> + */
>> +static int pseries_idle_cpuidle_driver_init(void)
>> +{
> 
> Drop the "idle", those names are too long.


 Sure.

> 
>> +	int cstate;
> 
> And use something else than 'cstate', we are among civilized people
> here ;-)


Yes :)

> 
>> +	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &pseries_idle_driver;
>> +
>> +	drv->state_count = 0;
>> +
>> +	for (cstate = 0; cstate < MAX_IDLE_STATE_COUNT; ++cstate) {
>> +
>> +		if (cstate > max_cstate)
>> +			break;
>> +
>> +		/* is the state not enabled? */
>> +		if (cpuidle_state_table[cstate].enter == NULL)
>> +			continue;
>> +
>> +		drv->states[drv->state_count] =	/* structure copy */
>> +			cpuidle_state_table[cstate];
>> +
>> +		if (cpuidle_state_table == dedicated_states)
>> +			drv->states[drv->state_count].target_residency =
>> +				__get_cpu_var(smt_snooze_delay);
>> +
>> +		drv->state_count += 1;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* pseries_idle_devices_uninit(void)
>> + * unregister cpuidle devices and de-allocate memory
>> + */
>> +static void pseries_idle_devices_uninit(void)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev;
>> +
>> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>> +		dev = per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, i);
>> +		cpuidle_unregister_device(dev);
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	free_percpu(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices);
>> +	return;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* pseries_idle_devices_init()
>> + * allocate, initialize and register cpuidle device
>> + */
>> +static int pseries_idle_devices_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	int i;
>> +	struct cpuidle_driver *drv = &pseries_idle_driver;
>> +	struct cpuidle_device *dev;
>> +
>> +	pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices = alloc_percpu(struct cpuidle_device);
>> +	if (pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices == NULL)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
>> +		dev = per_cpu_ptr(pseries_idle_cpuidle_devices, i);
>> +		dev->state_count = drv->state_count;
>> +		dev->cpu = i;
>> +		if (cpuidle_register_device(dev)) {
>> +			printk(KERN_DEBUG \
>> +				"cpuidle_register_device %d failed!\n", i);
>> +			return -EIO;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * pseries_idle_probe()
>> + * Choose state table for shared versus dedicated partition
>> + */
>> +static int pseries_idle_probe(void)
>> +{
>> +	if (max_cstate == 0) {
>> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "pseries processor idle disabled.\n");
>> +		return -EPERM;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
>> +		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle\n");
>> +		return -ENODEV;
>> +	}
> 
> Don't even printk here, this will happen on all !pseries machines and
> the debug output isn't useful. Also move the check of max-cstate to
> after the splpar test.


I ll move the check above.

 
> Overall, I quite like these patches, my comments are all pretty minor,
> hopefully the next round should be the one.


Thank you.

> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> 


Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Enable cpuidle and directly call cpuidle_idle_call() for pSeries

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> This patch enables cpuidle for pSeries and cpuidle_idle_call() is
> directly called from the idle loop. As a result pseries_idle cpuidle
> driver registered with cpuidle subsystem comes into action. This patch
> also removes the routines pseries_shared_idle_sleep and
> pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep as they are now implemented as part of
> pseries_idle cpuidle driver.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig         |    6 ++
>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c |   86 +-------------------------------
>  include/linux/cpuidle.h                |    2 -
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
> index e458872..0d2a028 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ config PPC_PASEMI_CPUFREQ
>  
>  endmenu
>  
> +menu "CPUIdle driver"
> +
> +source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
> +
> +endmenu
> +
>  config PPC601_SYNC_FIX
>  	bool "Workarounds for PPC601 bugs"
>  	depends on 6xx && (PPC_PREP || PPC_PMAC)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> index 9c6716a..f624e74 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>  #include <linux/root_dev.h>
> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
>  
>  #include <asm/mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/processor.h>
> @@ -74,9 +75,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(CMO_PageSize);
>  
>  int fwnmi_active;  /* TRUE if an FWNMI handler is present */
>  
> -static void pseries_shared_idle_sleep(void);
> -static void pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep(void);
> -
>  static struct device_node *pSeries_mpic_node;
>  
>  static void pSeries_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m)
> @@ -374,18 +372,9 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void)
>  
>  	pSeries_nvram_init();
>  
> -	/* Choose an idle loop */
>  	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
>  		vpa_init(boot_cpuid);
> -		if (get_lppaca()->shared_proc) {
> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using shared processor idle loop\n");
> -			ppc_md.power_save = pseries_shared_idle_sleep;
> -		} else {
> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using dedicated idle loop\n");
> -			ppc_md.power_save = pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep;
> -		}
> -	} else {
> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle loop\n");
> +		ppc_md.power_save = (void *)cpuidle_idle_call;
>  	}

I very very much dislike that cast. You should not have to cast a
function pointer ... EVER.

>  	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
> @@ -586,77 +575,6 @@ static int __init pSeries_probe(void)
>  	return 1;
>  }
>  

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 3/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Enable cpuidle and directly call cpuidle_idle_call() for pSeries

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/28/2011 04:35 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:58 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> This patch enables cpuidle for pSeries and cpuidle_idle_call() is
>> directly called from the idle loop. As a result pseries_idle cpuidle
>> driver registered with cpuidle subsystem comes into action. This patch
>> also removes the routines pseries_shared_idle_sleep and
>> pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep as they are now implemented as part of
>> pseries_idle cpuidle driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun R Bharadwaj <arun.r.bharadwaj@gmail.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig         |    6 ++
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c |   86 +-------------------------------
>>  include/linux/cpuidle.h                |    2 -
>>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 86 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
>> index e458872..0d2a028 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/Kconfig
>> @@ -211,6 +211,12 @@ config PPC_PASEMI_CPUFREQ
>>  
>>  endmenu
>>  
>> +menu "CPUIdle driver"
>> +
>> +source "drivers/cpuidle/Kconfig"
>> +
>> +endmenu
>> +
>>  config PPC601_SYNC_FIX
>>  	bool "Workarounds for PPC601 bugs"
>>  	depends on 6xx && (PPC_PREP || PPC_PMAC)
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>> index 9c6716a..f624e74 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>> @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/irq.h>
>>  #include <linux/seq_file.h>
>>  #include <linux/root_dev.h>
>> +#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
>>  
>>  #include <asm/mmu.h>
>>  #include <asm/processor.h>
>> @@ -74,9 +75,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(CMO_PageSize);
>>  
>>  int fwnmi_active;  /* TRUE if an FWNMI handler is present */
>>  
>> -static void pseries_shared_idle_sleep(void);
>> -static void pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep(void);
>> -
>>  static struct device_node *pSeries_mpic_node;
>>  
>>  static void pSeries_show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file *m)
>> @@ -374,18 +372,9 @@ static void __init pSeries_setup_arch(void)
>>  
>>  	pSeries_nvram_init();
>>  
>> -	/* Choose an idle loop */
>>  	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_SPLPAR)) {
>>  		vpa_init(boot_cpuid);
>> -		if (get_lppaca()->shared_proc) {
>> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using shared processor idle loop\n");
>> -			ppc_md.power_save = pseries_shared_idle_sleep;
>> -		} else {
>> -			printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using dedicated idle loop\n");
>> -			ppc_md.power_save = pseries_dedicated_idle_sleep;
>> -		}
>> -	} else {
>> -		printk(KERN_DEBUG "Using default idle loop\n");
>> +		ppc_md.power_save = (void *)cpuidle_idle_call;
>>  	}
> 
> I very very much dislike that cast. You should not have to cast a
> function pointer ... EVER.



Yes, I ll fix this.
This actually bought out a design flaw with the current pseries idle as
mentioned by you in the next patch of the series.

> 
>>  	if (firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_LPAR))
>> @@ -586,77 +575,6 @@ static int __init pSeries_probe(void)
>>  	return 1;
>>  }
>>  
> 
> Cheers,
> Ben.
> 
> 


Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:59 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> This patch makes pseries_idle_driver not to be registered when
> power_save=off kernel boot option is specified. The
> boot_option_idle_override variable used here is similar to
> its usage on x86.

Quick Q. With your changes, the CPU will never get into idle at all
until cpuidle initializes and the driver loads.

That means not only much later in the boot process, but potentially
never if the distro has the driver as a module and fails to load it, or
similar.

Can't that be an issue ? Shouldn't we keep at least one of the basic
idle functions as a fallback ?

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/28/2011 04:37 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Thu, 2011-11-17 at 16:59 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>> This patch makes pseries_idle_driver not to be registered when
>> power_save=off kernel boot option is specified. The
>> boot_option_idle_override variable used here is similar to
>> its usage on x86.
> 
> Quick Q. With your changes, the CPU will never get into idle at all
> until cpuidle initializes and the driver loads.
> 
> That means not only much later in the boot process, but potentially
> never if the distro has the driver as a module and fails to load it, or
> similar.
> 
> Can't that be an issue ? Shouldn't we keep at least one of the basic
> idle functions as a fallback ?
> 


On an LPAR if cpuidle is disabled, ppc_md.power_save is still set to
cpuidle_idle_call by default here. This would result in calling of
cpuidle_idle_call repeatedly, only for the call to return -ENODEV. The
default idle is never executed.
This would be a major design flaw. No fallback idle routine.

We propose to fix this by checking the return value of
ppc_md.power_save() call from void to int.
Right now return value is void, but if we change this to int, this
would solve two problems. One being removing the cast to a function
pointer in the prev patch and this design flaw stated above.

So by checking the return value of ppc_md.power_save(), we can invoke
the default idle on failure. But my only concern is about the effects of
changing the ppc_md.power_save() to return int on other powerpc
architectures. Would it be a good idea to change the return type to int
which would help us flag an error and fallback to default idle?

> Cheers,

> Ben.
> 
> 


Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:33 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:

> On an LPAR if cpuidle is disabled, ppc_md.power_save is still set to
> cpuidle_idle_call by default here. This would result in calling of
> cpuidle_idle_call repeatedly, only for the call to return -ENODEV. The
> default idle is never executed.
> This would be a major design flaw. No fallback idle routine.
> 
> We propose to fix this by checking the return value of
> ppc_md.power_save() call from void to int.
> Right now return value is void, but if we change this to int, this
> would solve two problems. One being removing the cast to a function
> pointer in the prev patch and this design flaw stated above.
> 
> So by checking the return value of ppc_md.power_save(), we can invoke
> the default idle on failure. But my only concern is about the effects of
> changing the ppc_md.power_save() to return int on other powerpc
> architectures. Would it be a good idea to change the return type to int
> which would help us flag an error and fallback to default idle?

I would have preferred an approach where the cpuidle module sets
ppc_md.power_save when loaded and restores it when unloaded ... but that
would have to go into the cpuidle core as a powerpc specific tweak and
might not be generally well received.

So go for it, add the return value, but you'll have to update all the
idle functions (grep for power_save in arch/powerpc to find them).

Cheers,
Ben.

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/29/2011 02:09 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:33 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> 
>> On an LPAR if cpuidle is disabled, ppc_md.power_save is still set to
>> cpuidle_idle_call by default here. This would result in calling of
>> cpuidle_idle_call repeatedly, only for the call to return -ENODEV. The
>> default idle is never executed.
>> This would be a major design flaw. No fallback idle routine.
>>
>> We propose to fix this by checking the return value of
>> ppc_md.power_save() call from void to int.
>> Right now return value is void, but if we change this to int, this
>> would solve two problems. One being removing the cast to a function
>> pointer in the prev patch and this design flaw stated above.
>>
>> So by checking the return value of ppc_md.power_save(), we can invoke
>> the default idle on failure. But my only concern is about the effects of
>> changing the ppc_md.power_save() to return int on other powerpc
>> architectures. Would it be a good idea to change the return type to int
>> which would help us flag an error and fallback to default idle?
> 
> I would have preferred an approach where the cpuidle module sets
> ppc_md.power_save when loaded and restores it when unloaded ... but that
> would have to go into the cpuidle core as a powerpc specific tweak and
> might not be generally well received.
> 
> So go for it, add the return value, but you'll have to update all the
> idle functions (grep for power_save in arch/powerpc to find them).
> 


Thanks Ben. Yes, I will update all the idle functions under powerpc.
I will re-work these patches with the discussed changes.

Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Deepthi Dharwar]

On 11/29/2011 12:14 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:

> On 11/29/2011 02:09 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> 
>> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 16:33 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>>
>>> On an LPAR if cpuidle is disabled, ppc_md.power_save is still set to
>>> cpuidle_idle_call by default here. This would result in calling of
>>> cpuidle_idle_call repeatedly, only for the call to return -ENODEV. The
>>> default idle is never executed.
>>> This would be a major design flaw. No fallback idle routine.
>>>
>>> We propose to fix this by checking the return value of
>>> ppc_md.power_save() call from void to int.
>>> Right now return value is void, but if we change this to int, this
>>> would solve two problems. One being removing the cast to a function
>>> pointer in the prev patch and this design flaw stated above.
kernel/idle.c:  ppc_md.power_save = NULL;
>>>
>>> So by checking the return value of ppc_md.power_save(), we can invoke
>>> the default idle on failure. But my only concern is about the effects of
>>> changing the ppc_md.power_save() to return int on other powerpc
>>> architectures. Would it be a good idea to change the return type to int
>>> which would help us flag an error and fallback to default idle?
>>
>> I would have preferred an approach where the cpuidle module sets
>> ppc_md.power_save when loaded and restores it when unloaded ... but that
>> would have to go into the cpuidle core as a powerpc specific tweak and
>> might not be generally well received.
>>
>> So go for it, add the return value, but you'll have to update all the
>> idle functions (grep for power_save in arch/powerpc to find them).
>>
> 
> 
> Thanks Ben. Yes, I will update all the idle functions under powerpc.
> I will re-work these patches with the discussed changes.
> 
> Regards,
> Deepthi
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-pm mailing list
> linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
> 
> 

Hi Ben,

I was trying to add a return value for power_save for all arch/powepc
idle functions but a few of them directly call *.S  routines, as they
are asm.

What would be a good way to change the return value  for asm routines ?
Do we make a change in asm only, put the return value in r3 or write a
wrapper function which would call these asm routines and return an int ?

Regards,
Deepthi

Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/4] cpuidle: (POWER) Handle power_save=off

[Benjamin Herrenschmidt]

On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 06:55 +0530, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
> I was trying to add a return value for power_save for all arch/powepc
> idle functions but a few of them directly call *.S  routines, as they
> are asm.
> 
> What would be a good way to change the return value  for asm
> routines ?
> Do we make a change in asm only, put the return value in r3 or write a
> wrapper function which would call these asm routines and return an
> int ?

No, add li r3,0 at the end, but beware that their return point might not
be ovbvious since we often return from an interrupt which modifies the
return address ... Let me know if there's some you can't figure out and
I'll help you.

Cheers,
Ben.