From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] bug fixes for coupled cpuidle Date: Sat, 02 Jun 2012 01:50:50 -0400 Message-ID: <4FC9A9BA.1020904@kernel.org> References: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1337364324-12171-1-git-send-email-ccross@android.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: linux-pm-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Colin Cross Cc: Kevin Hilman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Amit Kucheria , linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, Arjan van de Ven , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 05/18/2012 02:05 PM, Colin Cross wrote: > The last modifications made to the coupled cpuidle patches introduced > two bugs that I missed during testing. The online count was never > initialized, causing coupled idle to always wait and never enter the > ready loop. That hid the second bug, the ready count could never be > decremented after exiting idle. > > Len, these two patches could be squashed into patch 3 of the original > set. If you do squash them, you could also add Rafael's tags to the > set (Reviewed-by on 1 and 2, acked-by on 3). squash & tags update done. > Or I can reupload the > whole stack as v5 if you prefer. no need. thanks, -Len Brown, Intel Open Source Technology Center