From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@newoldbits.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure
Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 15:10:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4FD89144.7000203@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAORVsuXEkyU_OkjqLDhe_OMq-uLEBaMLnz-pkJ1jtgnmcNxZpw@mail.gmail.com>
On 06/13/2012 02:44 PM, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 07:33 PM, Deepthi Dharwar wrote:
>>> Hi Daniel,
>>
>> Hi Deepthi,
>>
>>> On 06/08/2012 09:32 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>>>
>>>> We have the state index passed as parameter to the 'enter' function.
>>>> Most of the drivers assign their 'enter' functions several times in
>>>> the cpuidle_state structure, as we have the index, we can delegate
>>>> to the driver to handle their own callback array.
>>>>
>>>> That will have the benefit of removing multiple lines of code in the
>>>> different drivers.
>>>>
>>>> In order to smoothly modify the driver, the 'enter' function are in
>>>> the driver structure and in the cpuidle state structure. That will
>>>> let the time to modify the different drivers one by one.
>>>> So the 'cpuidle_enter' function checks if the 'enter' callback is
>>>> assigned in the driver structure and use it, otherwise it invokes
>>>> the 'enter' assigned to the cpuidle_state.
>>>
>>>
>>> Currently, the backend driver initializes
>>> all the cpuidle states supported on the platform,
>>> and each state can have its own enter routine
>>> which can be unique This is a clean approach.
>>
>> Yes, I perfectly understood the purpose of this field but as clean it is
>> it does not make sense as it is not used in this way. If it is supposed
>> to be done in the way you are describing here, we should have the same
>> number of states and enter functions. Here it is how it is used:
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | Arch | nr states | nr enter function |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | x86 (nehalem) | 3 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | x86 (snb) | 4 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | x86 (atom) | 4 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM tegra | 1 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM omap3 | 7 | 2 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM omap4 | 3 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM ux500 | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM shmobile | 1 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM davinci | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM at91 | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM s3c64xx | 1 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM exynos | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | ARM kirkwood | 2 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | SH | 3 | 1 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | PPC | 2 | 2 |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> | | | |
>> | TOTAL | 39 | 17 |
>> | | | |
>> --------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> As you can see most of the enter functions are only used as one.
>> The Omap3 cpuidle driver enter function for C2 calls the enter function
>> of C1. Other arch, already use a table of callbacks or the index.
> There is a plan to remove the extra enter function as part of an
> optimization, cf. [1]. The fix is planned to reach the 3.6 mainline
> kernel via Kevin's tree [2].
>
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=133856365818099&w=2
> [2] http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/khilman/linux-omap-pm.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/for_3.6/pm/performance
>
> The result is that there will be only one enter function for OMAP3.
Another argument in favor of moving this field to the driver structure.
Thanks Jean for the information.
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-13 13:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-08 16:02 [RFC 1/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-08 16:02 ` [RFC 2/4] cpuidle: move enter_dead to " Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-08 16:02 ` [RFC 3/4] cpuidle : move tlb flag to the cpuidle header Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <1339171365-4098-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-08 16:02 ` [RFC 4/4] cpuidle: replace the 'disable' field by a flag Daniel Lezcano
2012-06-08 17:33 ` [linux-pm] [RFC 1/4] cpuidle: define the enter function in the driver structure Deepthi Dharwar
2012-06-08 21:34 ` Daniel Lezcano
[not found] ` <4FD27000.7000208-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
2012-06-13 12:44 ` [linux-pm] " Jean Pihet
2012-06-13 13:10 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-06-14 7:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2012-06-14 8:16 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4FD89144.7000203@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).