From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] thermal/drivers/cpu_cooling: Introduce the cpu idle cooling driver Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 11:45:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4abf0d97-d2b8-46ab-3c05-4a11510ac3fe@linaro.org> References: <1522945005-7165-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1522945005-7165-7-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <3f3b3b7a-3b74-aee2-2fac-f2759babe3f0@arm.com> <939f7943-feec-aaa2-3bd3-59a6618330c0@linaro.org> <20180416073729.GA4244@vireshk-i7> <0a3164f9-4738-e24e-6ed0-2c75024c304c@linaro.org> <20180416093747.GB4244@vireshk-i7> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20180416093747.GB4244@vireshk-i7> Content-Language: en-US Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Viresh Kumar Cc: Sudeep Holla , edubezval@gmail.com, kevin.wangtao@linaro.org, leo.yan@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, javi.merino@kernel.org, rui.zhang@intel.com, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Amit Daniel Kachhap List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 16/04/2018 11:37, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16-04-18, 09:44, Daniel Lezcano wrote: >> Because we rely on the number to identify the cluster and flag it >> 'processed'. The number itself is not important. > > It is, because you are creating multiple groups (like cpufreq > policies) right now based on cluster id. Which will be zero for all > the CPUs. So in a big little system we will have two cpufreq cooling > devices and one cpuidle cooling device. Can you elaborate a bit ? I'm not sure to get the point. BTW, Am I asked to change my code to stick to something which is not merged ? -- Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog