From: Thomas Richard <thomas.richard@bootlin.com>
To: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>,
"Gregory CLEMENT" <gregory.clement@bootlin.com>,
"Kumar Udit" <u-kumar1@ti.com>
Subject: Re: omap-i2c: runtime pm issue during suspend to ram
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2023 11:49:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4c31acd8-4edb-44f5-9a90-cb2f2dc530b6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f68c9a54-0fde-4709-9d2f-0d23a049341b@bootlin.com>
On 12/19/23 18:15, Thomas Richard wrote:
> Hello,
I add some people in this thread.
>
> I have a gpio expander (pca953x driver) connected to an i2c controller
> managed by the omap-i2c driver.
> And I have some issues with pm_runtime_force_suspend/resume during
> suspend to ram.
> For some reasons, related to hardware design, I need to access to this
> gpio expander during suspend_noirq and resume_noirq. So I had to move
> the suspend/resume of the pca953x to suspend_noirq/resume_noirq.
>
> The i2c controller is autosuspended when I start the suspend sequence.
> In suspend_noirq, I access to one gpio of the expander, so rpm_resume is
> called to resume the i2c controller.
> And rpm_resume returns an error because disable_depth > 0 [1]. In
> suspend_noirq, runtime pm is disabled (disable_depth is incremented when
> runtime pm is disabled [2]). So the expander is not reachable, and the
> access fails.
>
> [1]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L773
> [2]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L1474
>
> The suspend_noirq of the gpio expander don't do i2c access, so no
> problem for pca953x suspend.
> The pm_runtime_force_suspend (suspend_noirq [3]) of the i2c controller
> does nothing as the device is already suspended [4].
>
> [3]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c#L1579
> [4]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L1878
>
> Then during the pm_runtime_force_resume (resume_noirq [3]) the i2c
> controller is not resumed because needs_for_resume is equal to 0 [5].
> The needs_for_resume flag is set in pm_runtime_force_suspend [6] but we
> don't reach this point, because the device is already suspended [4].
>
> [5]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L1929
> [6]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L1900
>
> Then the resume_noirq of the pca953x driver is called, consequently
> rpm_resume is called to resume the i2c controller. But it is never
> resumed because disable_depth > 0 [7] (runtime pm is still disabled in
> resume_noirq). So the resume_noirq fails.
>
> [7]
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc6/source/drivers/base/power/runtime.c#L773
>
> I found a workaround which is to resume the controller and disable
> runtime pm during suspend, then runtime pm is enabled during resume.
> But there is probably a better solution to fix this issue.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Thomas Richard
>
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> index 42165ef57946..fe79b27b46fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-omap.c
> @@ -1575,9 +1575,24 @@ static int __maybe_unused
> omap_i2c_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int omap_i2c_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> + pm_runtime_disable(dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int omap_i2c_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + pm_runtime_enable(dev);
> + pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(dev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static const struct dev_pm_ops omap_i2c_pm_ops = {
> SET_NOIRQ_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend,
> pm_runtime_force_resume)
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_suspend, omap_i2c_resume)
> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(omap_i2c_runtime_suspend,
> omap_i2c_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
>
>
>
--
Thomas Richard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-20 10:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-19 17:15 omap-i2c: runtime pm issue during suspend to ram Thomas Richard
2023-12-20 10:49 ` Thomas Richard [this message]
2023-12-20 11:14 ` Tony Lindgren
2023-12-20 11:36 ` Thomas Richard
2023-12-20 13:46 ` Théo Lebrun
2023-12-26 16:47 ` Thomas Richard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4c31acd8-4edb-44f5-9a90-cb2f2dc530b6@bootlin.com \
--to=thomas.richard@bootlin.com \
--cc=gregory.clement@bootlin.com \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=u-kumar1@ti.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox