Linux Power Management development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: viresh.kumar@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, cai@lca.pw
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix Invalid EPB setting
Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2019 12:28:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5038220.5Ruqr03OBg@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191031192620.23482-1-srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>

On Thursday, October 31, 2019 8:26:20 PM CET Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> The max value of EPB can be only be 0x0F. Setting more than that results
> in "unchecked MSR access error". During CPU offline via cpufreq stop_cpu()
> callback, this error condition is triggered in the function
> intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf().
> 
> Instead, EPB corresponding to preference to maximize energy saving (0x0F),
> can be set. But this will conflict with the save/restore done in
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel_epb.c. Based on the test, if 0x0F is set in the
> function intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(), this gets restored during next
> CPU online operation. This is not desired.
> 
> Hence don't set EPB in the offline path in this driver and let the
> processing in intel_epb.c handle EPB.
> 
> Fixes: af3b7379e2d70 ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Force HWP min perf before offline")
> Reported-by: Qian Cai <cai@lca.pw>
> Cc: 5.0+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.0+
> Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 53a51c169451..8ab31702cf6a 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -847,11 +847,9 @@ static void intel_pstate_hwp_force_min_perf(int cpu)
>  	value |= HWP_MAX_PERF(min_perf);
>  	value |= HWP_MIN_PERF(min_perf);
>  
> -	/* Set EPP/EPB to min */
> +	/* Set EPP to min */
>  	if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HWP_EPP))
>  		value |= HWP_ENERGY_PERF_PREFERENCE(HWP_EPP_POWERSAVE);
> -	else
> -		intel_pstate_set_epb(cpu, HWP_EPP_BALANCE_POWERSAVE);
>  
>  	wrmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, MSR_HWP_REQUEST, value);
>  }
> 

Applying as a fix for 5.4, thanks!





      reply	other threads:[~2019-11-04 11:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-31 19:26 [PATCH] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix Invalid EPB setting Srinivas Pandruvada
2019-11-04 11:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5038220.5Ruqr03OBg@kreacher \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=cai@lca.pw \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox