From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daniel Lezcano Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: add missing header include Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 07:27:21 +0100 Message-ID: <508E21C9.9020004@linaro.org> References: <001401cdb332$93ffe450$bbffacf0$%han@samsung.com> <508DA864.8020503@linaro.org> <002101cdb572$fcc4d670$f64e8350$%han@samsung.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: In-Reply-To: <002101cdb572$fcc4d670$f64e8350$%han@samsung.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Jingoo Han Cc: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 10/29/2012 02:16 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: > On Monday, October 29, 2012 6:49 AM Marek Vasut wrote >> >> On 10/26/2012 06:30 AM, Jingoo Han wrote: >>> This patch adds missing device.h header to fix build warnings as be= low: >>> >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared = inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this de= finition or declaration, which is >> probably not what you want >>> [enabled by default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared = inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> In file included from drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:15:0: >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: 'struct device' declared = inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:26:41: warning: its scope is only this de= finition or declaration, which is >> probably not what you want >>> [enabled by default] >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h:27:45: warning: 'struct device' declared = inside parameter list [enabled by >> default] >>> >>> This build warning is introduced by commit efeca1b >>> "cpuidle / sysfs: change function parameter". >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han >>> Cc: Daniel Lezcano >>> --- >> >> Jingoo, could you copy-pastebin your config file. I don't have this >> warning and I would like to understand why. >=20 > Hi Daniel Lezcano, >=20 > Could you build the code by using GCC 4.6.x? > In my opinion, it would be better. That was the case. =3D> gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.6.1-9ubuntu3) 4.6.1 > Also, my config option is as below: > make exynos4_defconfig + CONFIG_CPU_IDLE Ok, I got the warning with this arch. Let's see why this is not happening with x86 ... Thanks -- Daniel > Best regards, > Jingoo Han >=20 >=20 >> >> Thanks >> -- Daniel >> >>> drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h | 2 ++ >>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h >>> index a5bbd1c..2120d9e 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h >>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.h >>> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@ >>> #ifndef __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H >>> #define __DRIVER_CPUIDLE_H >>> >>> +#include >>> + >>> /* For internal use only */ >>> extern struct cpuidle_governor *cpuidle_curr_governor; >>> extern struct list_head cpuidle_governors; >> >> >> -- >> Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software = for ARM SoCs >> >> Follow Linaro: Facebook | >> Twitter | >> Blog >=20 --=20 Linaro.org =E2=94=82 Open source software for= ARM SoCs =46ollow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog