linux-pm.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, khilman@ti.com, len.brown@intel.com,
	Trinabh Gupta <g.trinabh@gmail.com>,
	deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	rjw@sisk.pl, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	Sameer Nanda <snanda@chromium.org>,
	Lists Linaro-dev <linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2012 23:08:19 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <50A17353.8010604@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAODwPW-yjzrAFRA4Bv-MZETFEfq+cpaLvHaYX5K5HBtQtJKZQA@mail.gmail.com>

On 11/12/2012 10:09 PM, Julius Werner wrote:
> Thanks for moving this along, Daniel. I think this is the right
> approach... the cpuidle driver shouldn't be more complex than
> necessary.
> 
> Note that you are starting your loop too high in cpuidle_play_dead...
> states[state_count] is not an actual state anymore, it should start at
> state_count - 1. 

Yep. Thanks for catching this.

> Also, I think you can go ahead and do the same
> last-to-first loop transformation with immediate return in the menu
> governor, for an extra tiny bit of performance.

Yes, that makes sense.

Thanks for the review.

  -- Daniel

> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Daniel Lezcano
> <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> wrote:
>> This patch follows the discussion about reinitializing the power usage
>> when a C-state is added/removed.
>>
>>  https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/10/16/518
>>
>> We realized the power usage field is never filled and when it is
>> filled for tegra, the power_specified flag is not set making all these
>> values to be resetted when the driver is initialized with the set_power_state
>> function.
>>
>> Julius and I feel this is over-engineered and the power_specified
>> flag could be simply removed and continue assuming the states are
>> backward sorted.
>>
>> The menu governor select function is simplified as the power is ordered.
>> Actually the condition is always true with the current code.
>>
>> The cpuidle_play_dead function is also simplified by doing a reverse lookup
>> on the array.
>>
>> The set_power_states function is removed as it does no make sense anymore.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c        |   17 ++++-------------
>>  drivers/cpuidle/driver.c         |   25 -------------------------
>>  drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c |    8 ++------
>>  include/linux/cpuidle.h          |    2 +-
>>  4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> index 711dd83..f983262 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c
>> @@ -69,24 +69,15 @@ int cpuidle_play_dead(void)
>>  {
>>         struct cpuidle_device *dev = __this_cpu_read(cpuidle_devices);
>>         struct cpuidle_driver *drv = cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev);
>> -       int i, dead_state = -1;
>> -       int power_usage = -1;
>> +       int i;
>>
>>         if (!drv)
>>                 return -ENODEV;
>>
>>         /* Find lowest-power state that supports long-term idle */
>> -       for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
>> -               struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
>> -
>> -               if (s->power_usage < power_usage && s->enter_dead) {
>> -                       power_usage = s->power_usage;
>> -                       dead_state = i;
>> -               }
>> -       }
>> -
>> -       if (dead_state != -1)
>> -               return drv->states[dead_state].enter_dead(dev, dead_state);
>> +       for (i = drv->state_count; i >= CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i--)
>> +               if (drv->states[i].play_dead)
>> +                       return drv->states[i].enter_dead(dev, i);
>>
>>         return -ENODEV;
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
>> index 3af841f..bb045f1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/driver.c
>> @@ -19,34 +19,9 @@ DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpuidle_driver_lock);
>>  static void __cpuidle_set_cpu_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int cpu);
>>  static struct cpuidle_driver * __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(int cpu);
>>
>> -static void set_power_states(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
>> -{
>> -       int i;
>> -
>> -       /*
>> -        * cpuidle driver should set the drv->power_specified bit
>> -        * before registering if the driver provides
>> -        * power_usage numbers.
>> -        *
>> -        * If power_specified is not set,
>> -        * we fill in power_usage with decreasing values as the
>> -        * cpuidle code has an implicit assumption that state Cn
>> -        * uses less power than C(n-1).
>> -        *
>> -        * With CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX, C0 is already assigned
>> -        * an power value of -1.  So we use -2, -3, etc, for other
>> -        * c-states.
>> -        */
>> -       for (i = CPUIDLE_DRIVER_STATE_START; i < drv->state_count; i++)
>> -               drv->states[i].power_usage = -1 - i;
>> -}
>> -
>>  static void __cpuidle_driver_init(struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
>>  {
>>         drv->refcnt = 0;
>> -
>> -       if (!drv->power_specified)
>> -               set_power_states(drv);
>>  }
>>
>>  static int __cpuidle_register_driver(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int cpu)
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> index 2efee27..14eb11f 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpuidle/governors/menu.c
>> @@ -312,7 +312,6 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>>  {
>>         struct menu_device *data = &__get_cpu_var(menu_devices);
>>         int latency_req = pm_qos_request(PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LATENCY);
>> -       int power_usage = -1;
>>         int i;
>>         int multiplier;
>>         struct timespec t;
>> @@ -383,11 +382,8 @@ static int menu_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
>>                 if (s->exit_latency * multiplier > data->predicted_us)
>>                         continue;
>>
>> -               if (s->power_usage < power_usage) {
>> -                       power_usage = s->power_usage;
>> -                       data->last_state_idx = i;
>> -                       data->exit_us = s->exit_latency;
>> -               }
>> +               data->last_state_idx = i;
>> +               data->exit_us = s->exit_latency;
>>         }
>>
>>         /* not deepest C-state chosen for low predicted residency */
>> diff --git a/include/linux/cpuidle.h b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
>> index 3711b34..24cd103 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/cpuidle.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/cpuidle.h
>> @@ -126,9 +126,9 @@ struct cpuidle_driver {
>>         struct module           *owner;
>>         int                     refcnt;
>>
>> -       unsigned int            power_specified:1;
>>         /* set to 1 to use the core cpuidle time keeping (for all states). */
>>         unsigned int            en_core_tk_irqen:1;
>> +       /* states array must be ordered in decreasing power consumption */
>>         struct cpuidle_state    states[CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX];
>>         int                     state_count;
>>         int                     safe_state_index;
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
>>


-- 
 <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2012-11-12 22:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <50831CA3.2020602@linaro.org>
2012-11-12 20:26 ` [RFC] cpuidle - remove the power_specified field in the driver Daniel Lezcano
2012-11-12 21:09   ` Julius Werner
2012-11-12 22:08     ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-11-18  8:40   ` Francesco Lavra
2012-11-18  9:17     ` Daniel Lezcano
2012-12-10 19:09       ` Julius Werner
2012-12-10 22:41         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-11  9:46         ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=50A17353.8010604@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=deepthi@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=g.trinabh@gmail.com \
    --cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=snanda@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).