From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Arjan van de Ven Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] PM: Introduce Intel PowerClamp Driver Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 13:56:45 -0800 Message-ID: <50A2C21D.6070108@linux.intel.com> References: <1352757831-5202-1-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <1352757831-5202-4-git-send-email-jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com> <20121113211602.GA30150@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga09.intel.com ([134.134.136.24]:26369 "EHLO mga09.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751447Ab2KMV4q (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2012 16:56:46 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20121113211602.GA30150@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com Cc: Jacob Pan , Linux PM , LKML , Rafael Wysocki , Len Brown , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Zhang Rui , Rob Landley On 11/13/2012 1:16 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 02:03:51PM -0800, Jacob Pan wrote: >> Intel PowerClamp driver performs synchronized idle injection across >> all online CPUs. The goal is to maintain a given package level C-state >> ratio. >> >> Compared to other throttling methods already exist in the kernel, >> such as ACPI PAD (taking CPUs offline) and clock modulation, this is often >> more efficient in terms of performance per watt. >> >> Please refer to Documentation/thermal/intel_powerclamp.txt for more details. > > If I read this correctly, this forces a group of CPUs into idle for > about 600 milliseconds at a time. This would indeed delay grace periods, 6ms not 600