From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Russ Anderson <rja@sgi.com>
Cc: "rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Sivaram Nair <sivaramn@nvidia.com>,
Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>,
"akpm@linux-foundation.org" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
"shuox.liu@intel.com" <shuox.liu@intel.com>,
"yanmin_zhang@intel.com" <yanmin_zhang@intel.com>,
"linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [regression] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver livelocks idle system
Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2012 22:59:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <50CF95AD.8030406@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20121217193612.GA28600@sgi.com>
On 12/17/2012 08:36 PM, Russ Anderson wrote:
> The 3.7 kernel grinds to a halt on boot of a system with
> 2048 cpus. NMI showed most of the cpus in
> _raw_spin_lock in cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(). (backtrace below)
>
> A quick look at cpuidle_get_cpu_driver() shows the hot lock.
>
> In drivers/cpuidle/driver.c:
> --------------------------------------------------------
> /**
> * cpuidle_get_cpu_driver - return the driver tied with a cpu
> */
> struct cpuidle_driver *cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(struct cpuidle_device *dev)
> {
> struct cpuidle_driver *drv;
>
> if (!dev)
> return NULL;
>
> spin_lock(&cpuidle_driver_lock);
> drv = __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver(dev->cpu);
> spin_unlock(&cpuidle_driver_lock);
>
> return drv;
> }
> --------------------------------------------------------
Hi Russ,
thanks for investigating the problem. You are right, there is a
bottleneck here.
Regarding how is used the cpuidle code, I think it is safe to remove the
locks.
> This change was added in on Nov 14th, 2012.
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git;a=commit;h=bf4d1b5ddb78f86078ac6ae0415802d5f0c68f92
>
> The patch says it adds support for cpus with different characteristics,
> but adds a big global lock. The comment claims "no impact for the other
> platforms if the option is disabled", which leads me to believe the
> spin_lock was added inadvertently. CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS is off
> in my config file.
>
> linux$ grep CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS .config
> # CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS is not set
>
> As more cpus become idle, more cpus fight over the lock until
> the system livelocks on the crushing weight of idle.
>
> The fix may be to move the spin_lock into __cpuidle_get_cpu_driver,
> which has different versions for CONFIG_CPU_IDLE_MULTIPLE_DRIVERS,
> to avoid impacting the disabled case, or get rid of the spin_lock
> all together.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> == UV NMI process trace cpu 12: ==
> CPU 12
> Pid: 0, comm: swapper/12 Tainted: G O 3.7.0.rja-sgi+ #38
> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff81614e45>] [<ffffffff81614e45>] _raw_spin_lock+0x25/0x30
> [...]
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff814c891c>] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver+0x1c/0x30
> [<ffffffff814c871d>] cpuidle_idle_call+0x7d/0x1b0
> [<ffffffff8101d08d>] cpu_idle+0xdd/0x130
> [<ffffffff8160a3ea>] start_secondary+0xc6/0xcc
> --------------------------------------------------------
>
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-17 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-12-17 19:36 [regression] cpuidle_get_cpu_driver livelocks idle system Russ Anderson
2012-12-17 21:59 ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2012-12-17 23:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2012-12-20 18:16 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=50CF95AD.8030406@linaro.org \
--to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rja@sgi.com \
--cc=shuox.liu@intel.com \
--cc=sivaramn@nvidia.com \
--cc=yanmin_zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).