From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tushar Behera Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: remove unreachable code Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 11:20:15 +0530 Message-ID: <50ED0517.5090907@linaro.org> References: <1357650191-30842-1-git-send-email-rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1357650191-30842-1-git-send-email-rajagopal.venkat@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rajagopal Venkat Cc: mturquette@linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, linaro-dev@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 01/08/2013 06:33 PM, Rajagopal Venkat wrote: > while reparenting a clock, NULL check is done for clock in > consideration and its new parent. So re-check is not required. > If done, else part becomes unreachable. > > Signed-off-by: Rajagopal Venkat > --- > drivers/clk/clk.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk.c b/drivers/clk/clk.c > index 251e45d..f896584 100644 > --- a/drivers/clk/clk.c > +++ b/drivers/clk/clk.c > @@ -1048,10 +1048,7 @@ void __clk_reparent(struct clk *clk, struct clk *new_parent) > > hlist_del(&clk->child_node); > > - if (new_parent) > - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); > - else > - hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &clk_orphan_list); > + hlist_add_head(&clk->child_node, &new_parent->children); > > #ifdef CONFIG_COMMON_CLK_DEBUG > if (!inited) > The same logic holds good for following piece of code too. 1060 |-------if (new_parent) 1061 |-------|-------new_parent_d = new_parent->dentry; 1062 |-------else 1063 |-------|-------new_parent_d = orphandir; -- Tushar Behera