From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Santosh Shilimkar Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] time : pass broadcast parameter Date: Wed, 27 Feb 2013 10:39:14 +0530 Message-ID: <512D94FA.7070207@ti.com> References: <1361917047-29230-1-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> <1361917047-29230-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from arroyo.ext.ti.com ([192.94.94.40]:37193 "EHLO arroyo.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699Ab3B0FH6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Feb 2013 00:07:58 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1361917047-29230-2-git-send-email-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org> Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Lezcano Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, patches@linaro.org, linus.walleij@stericsson.com On Wednesday 27 February 2013 03:47 AM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > The broadcast timer could be passed as parameter to the function > instead of using again tick_broadcast_device.evtdev which was > previously used in the caller function. > > Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano > --- The change doesn't buy us as such even after looking at next patch which tries to use bc. No strong opinion though. Regards, Santosh