From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stratos Karafotis Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 linux-next] cpufreq: conservative: Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 18:21:05 +0200 Message-ID: <513E0471.6@semaphore.gr> References: <51366C77.3080309@semaphore.gr> <51374F8D.9040300@semaphore.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from sema.semaphore.gr ([78.46.194.137]:37841 "EHLO sema.semaphore.gr" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753320Ab3CKQVJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2013 12:21:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Viresh Kumar , cpufreq@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 6 March 2013 22:15, Stratos Karafotis wrote: >> Use an inline function to evaluate freq_target to avoid duplicate code. >> >> Also, define a macro for the default frequency step. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis >> --- >> drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq_conservative.c | 27 +++++++++++++++------------ >> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar Hi Rafael, Could you please let me know if this patchset is going to be applied or not? Thank you in advance for your time, Stratos